Author Topic: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?  (Read 2689 times)

Desertdog

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,360
Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« on: November 10, 2008, 10:40:16 PM »
Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
Expected FCC transition chief served during 'Fairness Doctrine' days
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=80424


Democrat Henry Rivera, a former commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission, is expected to head President-elect Barack Obama's FCC transition team, a move that has sparked fear in media circles that the Fairness Doctrine may return to silence conservative talk radio.

If reenacted, the "Fairness Doctrine" would require broadcasts over the public airwaves to give equal time to opposing political views. For talk radio, which boomed after the law's repeal in 1987 by building an audience devoted to conservative talk, the law's return would decimate the industry's marketability.

Many fear the "Fairness Doctrine" would drive talk radio hosts – like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Michael Savage – out of business.

Brian Maloney of the blog The Radio Equalizer said in his post, "Meet Talk's Executioner,"  he believes Rivera will use his position to bring back the law for that very purpose.

Rivera, according to Maloney, "is expected to lead the push to dismantle commercial talk radio that is favored by a number of Democratic Party senators. Rivera will play a pivotal role in preventing critics from having a public voice during Obama's tenure in office."

Rivera served on the five-member FCC from 1981 to 1985 under Republican chairman Mark Fowler. He is now a partner at the Wiley Rein law firm, the same firm current FCC chairman Kevin Martin worked at prior to his appointment to the FCC.

Rivera resigned from the FCC in 1985. The remainder of his term was served by President Reagan appointee Patricia Diaz Dennis, who opposed the Fairness Doctrine. The law was then repealed in 1987 after the FCC admitted it "had the net effect of reducing rather than enhancing the discussion of controversial issues of public importance."

Rivera himself has not confirmed his selection as Obama's FCC transition team chief, first reported by Multichannel News.

"The only thing I can tell you is that there will be a release of the folks involved in that," Rivera told the News. "I just can't comment on anything. They told us not to talk to the press."

Rivera also declined to answer WND's request for his position on reinstating the Fairness Doctrine.

Obama's position on the law also remains unclear.

"Sen. Obama does not support reimposing the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters," campaign press secretary Michael Ortiz told Broadcasting & Cable earlier this year. "He considers this debate to be a distraction from the conversation we should be having about opening up the airwaves and modern communications to as many diverse viewpoints as possible."

As WND reported, ATI-News President Brad O'Leary examined Obama's legal and organizational attempts to silence media detractors during the presidential race and came to a different conclusion.

"Barack Obama has shown a stunning lack of tolerance for free speech throughout the course of this campaign," said O'Leary. "His presidency, combined with supermajorities for Democrats in Congress, would almost certainly bring back the so-called 'Fairness Doctrine' and allow the Democrats to snuff out any broadcasters with whom they disagree."

Democrats in Congress have been more definitive in advocating the "Fairness Doctrine."

In June, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., affirmed her support to Human Events reporter John Gizzi.

Speaking on Albuquerque station KKOB, Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., told host Jim Villanucci, "I would want this station and all stations to have to present a balanced perspective and different points of view, instead of always hammering away at one side of the political [spectrum]."

Bingaman said, "For many, many years, we operated under a Fairness Doctrine in this country. I think the country was well-served. I think the public discussion was at a higher level and more intelligent in those days than it has become since."

Rush Limbaugh, the most-listened to radio host in American history, however, blasted Bingaman's comment that there were "a lot of talk stations" before 1987.

"A 125 radio stations talking about carrot cake recipes for the holidays," Limbaugh said. "Senator Bingaman, do you know how many talk-radio stations there are in America today? Try over 2,000 since the Fairness Doctrine was lifted, and on those 2,000 radio stations are countless points of view, from the extreme communist left to the wacko whatever it is way out on the fringe right. They're all over the place."

Republican Rep. Mike Pence of Indiana has opposed to the Fairness Doctrine by introducing the Broadcasters Freedom Act, arguing that lifting the restrictive law has "opened the public airwaves to free and vigorous discussion of controversial issues by individuals of all political stripes."

"Bringing back the Fairness Doctrine would amount to government control over political views expressed on the public airwaves," Pence said. "It is a dangerous proposal to suggest the government should be in the business of rationing free speech."

Pence, a former broadcaster, said his Broadcasters Freedom Act would ensure that "true freedom and fairness will remain on our radio airwaves."

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2008, 11:14:46 PM »
Quote
"Sen. Obama does not support reimposing the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters," campaign press secretary Michael Ortiz told Broadcasting & Cable earlier this year. "He considers this debate to be a distraction from the conversation we should be having about opening up the airwaves and modern communications to as many diverse viewpoints as possible."

Hello hello, I I think think we we have have some some doublespeak.

Leatherneck

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,028
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2008, 06:07:18 AM »
Quote
opening up the airwaves and modern communications to as many diverse viewpoints as possible.
So these airwaves are somehow closed to certain viewpoints? How? By whom? Oh, freedom of choice you say? So in other words, Obama wants to remove that freedom of choice?

Got it. And so it begins...

TC
TC
RT Refugee

Waitone

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,133
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2008, 07:18:12 AM »
A lot of spectrum space will open once analog TV shuts down Feb '09.  Does that mean a flurry of preferential assignments for new broadcast facilities to compete with Evil Right Wing Talk?  Can't tell at this point.  What I am confident of is Evil Right Wing Talk will put up one serious fight; a fight the Good and Virtuous Forces of Change will not want to lose.
"Men, it has been well said, think in herds. It will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one."
- Charles Mackay, Scottish journalist, circa 1841

"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it." - John Lennon

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2008, 09:17:34 AM »
A lot of spectrum space will open once analog TV shuts down Feb '09.  Does that mean a flurry of preferential assignments for new broadcast facilities to compete with Evil Right Wing Talk?  Can't tell at this point.  What I am confident of is Evil Right Wing Talk will put up one serious fight; a fight the Good and Virtuous Forces of Change will not want to lose.

The whitespace is thankfully going to be used for wide area internet, according to the latest releases. Hopefully. Google and others have been fighting hard for that.

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2008, 09:52:45 AM »
So Air America will be back with a defeated Al Franken?

So NPR will have to have equal time for all view points?

Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

Desertdog

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,360
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2008, 10:37:24 AM »
Quote
So Air America will be back with a defeated Al Franken?
If they had anybody to listen to them, they would still be on the air.

Quote
So NPR will have to have equal time for all view points?
I really doubt if NPR would be included in the regulations as they are not, as  they say falsely, a commericial station. 

After all they are government sponsored and live on donations.  Yeah, right, my behind.  Government sponsored , YES.  No advertisement, BS.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2008, 11:26:26 AM »
If they mandate that Air America come back, are they going to force advertisers to it at gunpoint? It failed because nobody wanted their ads paired with shrill liberals that nobody wanted to listen to.

Boomhauer

  • Former Moderator, fired for embezzlement and abuse of power
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,382
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2008, 11:54:47 AM »
Air America will be government funded, of course...

Quote
So NPR will have to have equal time for all view points

Don't be silly...NPR and the MSM networks will be completely exempt. They always present "fair and balanced" views...
Quote from: Ben
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...

Quote from: bluestarlizzard
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.

OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...

Quote from: Balog
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!

Cliff47

  • New Member
  • Posts: 29
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2008, 01:53:33 PM »
Shouldn't the MSM (Main Stream Media) be renamed to LSM (Lame Stream Media)??

Talk radio (of the Conservative variety) could easily migrate to the Internet.  Couldn't it??

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2008, 01:55:26 PM »
Shouldn't the MSM (Main Stream Media) be renamed to LSM (Lame Stream Media)??

Talk radio (of the Conservative variety) could easily migrate to the Internet.  Couldn't it??

In Israel, we had something called Channel 7. It was an illegal radical nationalist channel. After they failed to get the legal permits, they moved online and morphed into a radio/TV/news service, all online, exempt from any of the rules on broadcast and cable media that we have here.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

buzz_knox

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2008, 02:19:38 PM »
If they mandate that Air America come back, are they going to force advertisers to it at gunpoint? It failed because nobody wanted their ads paired with shrill liberals that nobody wanted to listen to.

What they'll do is require stations with Rush, Liddy, etc, to follow up with an equal amount of Air America programming.  If they don't want the lib propaganda, they don't get Rush.  So, the advertisers will have to pay to support the libs to get the conservatives that pay the bills.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2008, 03:52:32 PM »
What they'll do is require stations with Rush, Liddy, etc, to follow up with an equal amount of Air America programming.  If they don't want the lib propaganda, they don't get Rush.  So, the advertisers will have to pay to support the libs to get the conservatives that pay the bills.

Be interesting to see how they handle XM's America Right and America Left.

Boomhauer

  • Former Moderator, fired for embezzlement and abuse of power
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,382
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #13 on: November 11, 2008, 04:25:38 PM »
Shouldn't the MSM (Main Stream Media) be renamed to LSM (Lame Stream Media)??

Talk radio (of the Conservative variety) could easily migrate to the Internet.  Couldn't it??

They are gunning for the internet, too.

Increments, increments...

Quote from: Ben
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...

Quote from: bluestarlizzard
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.

OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...

Quote from: Balog
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!

Tuco

  • Fastest non-sequitur in the West.
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,137
  • If you miss you had better miss very well
Re: Obama to appoint talk radio's executioner?
« Reply #14 on: November 11, 2008, 06:19:37 PM »
......
I really doubt if NPR would be included in the regulations as they are not, as  they say falsely, a commericial station. 
After all they are government sponsored and live on donations.  Yeah, right, my behind.  Government sponsored , YES.  No advertisement, BS.

 :laugh:

This segment of All Things Considered was brought to you by Archer Daniels Midland. 
At ADM we don't let on how much we really give NPR, but we are resourceful by nature.
7-11 was a part time job.