Author Topic: Oil is bad for Us, Good for Brazil  (Read 901 times)

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,249
  • I'm an Extremist!
Oil is bad for Us, Good for Brazil
« on: August 19, 2009, 10:40:14 AM »
Obama underwrites loan to Brazil for offshore drilling. I wonder who will get the oil besides not us?

PS - What are our carbon offset <TM> plans for this?

-----------------------
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574346610120524166.html

    * The Wall Street Journal

    * REVIEW & OUTLOOK
    * AUGUST 18, 2009, 1:45 P.M. ET

Obama Underwrites Offshore Drilling
Too bad it's not in U.S. waters.

   
You read that headline correctly. Unfortunately, the Obama Administration is financing oil exploration off Brazil.

The U.S. is going to lend billions of dollars to Brazil's state-owned oil company, Petrobras, to finance exploration of the huge offshore discovery in Brazil's Tupi oil field in the Santos Basin near Rio de Janeiro. Brazil's planning minister confirmed that White House National Security Adviser James Jones met this month with Brazilian officials to talk about the loan.

The U.S. Export-Import Bank tells us it has issued a "preliminary commitment" letter to Petrobras in the amount of $2 billion and has discussed with Brazil the possibility of increasing that amount. Ex-Im Bank says it has not decided whether the money will come in the form of a direct loan or loan guarantees. Either way, this corporate foreign aid may strike some readers as odd, given that the U.S. Treasury seems desperate for cash and Petrobras is one of the largest corporations in the Americas.

But look on the bright side. If President Obama has embraced offshore drilling in Brazil, why not in the old U.S.A.? The land of the sorta free and the home of the heavily indebted has enormous offshore oil deposits, and last year ahead of the November elections, with gasoline at $4 a gallon, Congress let a ban on offshore drilling expire.

The Bush Administration's five-year plan (2007-2012) to open the outer continental shelf to oil exploration included new lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico. But in 2007 environmentalists went to court to block drilling in Alaska and in April a federal court ruled in their favor. In May, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said his department was unsure whether that ruling applied only to Alaska or all offshore drilling. So it asked an appeals court for clarification. Late last month the court said the earlier decision applied only to Alaska, opening the way for the sale of leases in the Gulf. Mr. Salazar now says the sales will go forward on August 19.

This is progress, however slow. But it still doesn't allow the U.S. to explore in Alaska or along the East and West Coasts, which could be our equivalent of the Tupi oil fields, which are set to make Brazil a leading oil exporter. Americans are right to wonder why Mr. Obama is underwriting in Brazil what he won't allow at home.
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

41magsnub

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,579
  • Don't make me assume my ultimate form!
Re: Oil is bad for Us, Good for Brazil
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2009, 10:42:01 AM »
That...  and are we in a position to be lending money to anybody?  This is like taking a cash advance on your credit card to lend it to somebody else.

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: Oil is bad for Us, Good for Brazil
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2009, 10:43:24 AM »
Everyone else run out of oil, then we tap ours.

Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,987
Re: Oil is bad for Us, Good for Brazil
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2009, 11:03:21 AM »
Everyone else run out of oil, then we tap ours.



That implies that oil is finite in the tragic sense of peak oil.

I remember reading elsewhere that oil may not be "dead dinosaurs" and is a natural phenomenon of the earth's mantle.  While there may be a finite production cycle that the earth can produce, it would be well above the current peak oil expectations.

I'm more upset that one STATE is lending money to another STATE to drill for an extremely profitable resource that shouldn't require taxpayer debt subsidization.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: Oil is bad for Us, Good for Brazil
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2009, 11:28:08 AM »
Quote
I'm more upset that one STATE is lending money to another STATE to drill for an extremely profitable resource that shouldn't require taxpayer debt subsidization.

It would be almost ok if the taxpayers got a good ROI, but I expect it to be as profitable for taxpayers as GM.
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama