Author Topic: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws  (Read 5180 times)

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,987
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #25 on: January 08, 2010, 06:21:23 PM »
Well, at least our "betters" don't have to get scanned/x-rayed/made nekkid.

Halle Barry doesn't have to be backscattered.  In fact, she can just skip ahead of everyone else in the security line.  'Cuz really, she's not a terrorist.  A $10 TSA equivalent employee in Canada used his "personal judgement" so I'm comfortable with that. [popcorn]

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9D3Q3L80&show_article=1

Quote
MONTREAL (AP) - Canadian police say it was wrong for one of their officers to whisk Halle Berry, her model boyfriend and baby through airport security.

Police Inspector Jimmy Cacchione said it was the personal initiative of one officer and not something the department supported.

Quebec journalist Marieve Paradis said on her blog Friday, she spotted Berry, her partner, Canadian model Gabriel Aubry, and their child, being led to the front of the security line at a Montreal airport Monday, while other passengers waited more than an hour.

The officer will not be reprimanded and the police airport unit will institute stricter rules for the future, Cacchione added.

Berry's agent Toni Howard was not immediately available for comment.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #26 on: January 08, 2010, 08:54:57 PM »
I think it is high time to teach these TSA thugs a lesson they won't soon forget.
I think I need to fly somewhere and book a flight through an airport that uses these machines.
One look at my nekkidness through one of those machines and they won't soon want to do it again.
That'll learn 'em, dern 'em...
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #27 on: January 08, 2010, 08:59:54 PM »
i can see em putting in for disability claims now.  screaming  "my eyes!! my eyes!!"
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #28 on: January 08, 2010, 09:04:12 PM »
That is the plan =D.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

RevDisk

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,633
    • RevDisk.net
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #29 on: January 08, 2010, 09:14:10 PM »
I think it is high time to teach these TSA thugs a lesson they won't soon forget.
I think I need to fly somewhere and book a flight through an airport that uses these machines.
One look at my nekkidness through one of those machines and they won't soon want to do it again.
That'll learn 'em, dern 'em...

Dude...   Ah.   Uh.   Even for the TSA...   Isn't that a bit harsh?


 =D
"Rev, your picture is in my King James Bible, where Paul talks about "inventors of evil."  Yes, I know you'll take that as a compliment."  - Fistful, possibly highest compliment I've ever received.

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #30 on: January 08, 2010, 09:26:33 PM »
They'll bankrupt the nation with their workmans comp claims.

KD5NRH

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,926
  • I'm too sexy for you people.
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #31 on: January 09, 2010, 06:05:10 AM »
One look at my nekkidness through one of those machines and they won't soon want to do it again./quote]

That does raise a question: if you don't fit through the scanner, can the other passengers raise enough hell at your exemption that you have to be strip searched manually?  I know of someone who might be willing to test this...after not showering for a few days, even  >:D

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,017
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #32 on: January 09, 2010, 09:10:31 AM »
I wonder how the three stainless-steel screws in my hip to repair my hip fracture are going to show up.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #33 on: January 09, 2010, 11:34:05 AM »
Quote
4. There are no constriction marks from underwear on her waist or thighs/groin, a bra to her breasts, or the belt that is supposedly around her waist as suggested by the presence of the belt buckle. She'd also have to be wearing a skirt or pants with no buttons, no fly, no zipper, tab-hooks, or rivets in them. I can't definitively say she's not wearing a side or back zippered skirt or pants, but it seems like it increases the odds of this being a fake substantially.

In the interest of truth, goodness, and the American Way, I'm glad that you took the time and effort to inspect this picture so closely to expose it as a fake.   =D
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,857
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #34 on: January 09, 2010, 06:33:51 PM »
In the interest of truth, goodness, and the American Way, I'm glad that you took the time and effort to inspect this picture so closely to expose it as a fake.   =D
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Matthew Carberry

  • Formerly carebear
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,281
  • Fiat justitia, pereat mundus
Re: Full body scanners vs kiddie porn laws
« Reply #35 on: January 09, 2010, 07:53:40 PM »
Keister bomb, swallowed condom bomb, "Dark Knight" style sewn into fat jihadi bomb with remote detonator.

Barn doors, did you see where the horse went?
"Not all unwise laws are unconstitutional laws, even where constitutional rights are potentially involved." - Eugene Volokh

"As for affecting your movement, your Rascal should be able to achieve the the same speeds no matter what holster rig you are wearing."