Author Topic: Background chec ==> Facebook?  (Read 2886 times)

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,776
Background chec ==> Facebook?
« on: February 27, 2011, 06:52:40 PM »
The Norman, OK, police department is now demanding that prospective hires cough up their Facebook passwords so the cops can read their personal, private posts.

http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpp/news/local/022311-oklahoma-police-department-facebook-passwords

Any lawyer types feel like offering an opinion as to whether or not this may pass legal scrutiny? My personal opinion is that it won't -- and if it does, it shouldn't. But I'm one of the troglodytes who don't even have facebook accounts, so for me it's just confirmation that I don't want to create an account.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

Pharmacology

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,744
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2011, 07:23:02 PM »
What's stopping applicants from simply changing the name on the account to a nickname?

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,192
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2011, 10:56:38 PM »
I have two accounts, a vanilla one with three vanilla friends under my real name and my real account with my nick name and my wild and woolly friends. I'd have no problem giving the vanilla one.
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2011, 11:04:37 PM »
I have two accounts, a vanilla one with three vanilla friends under my real name and my real account with my nick name and my wild and woolly friends. I'd have no problem giving the vanilla one.

Which will get you 1) fired and 2) possibly prosecuted for fraud and terroristic crimes if they catch you on that.

Yes, it is considered legal because of the security issues, public trust issues, and the general "we will be in control of every aspect of your life" issues gooberment is into these days.  Any legal challenge will be met with "Nobody is forcing you to apply for the job."

I still do not understand why anybody would want a FacePage, MyBook type account, or why folks that have them are stoopid enough to put the stuff one seems to see most often out there for the public to laugh at.  But then I also do not understand either the why or the how of texting or tweeting - you've got voicemail, right?

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2011, 12:41:21 AM »
Another reason all content on the internet is more or less public domain, esp when the cops get involved in any way. But hey, it's not like you have something to hide right?  ;/

That being said, people are idiots for putting some of the things online that they do. The girl who posted pics of herself, ummm, orally servicing her dog, on an unsecured LiveJournal page comes to mind. The fact the trolls at 4chan got a hold of them and mailed them to her parents and every kid at her school is just an unfortunate but hardly unforeseeable result.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,037
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2011, 08:33:12 AM »
I still do not understand why anybody would want a FacePage, MyBook type account, or why folks that have them are stoopid enough to put the stuff one seems to see most often out there for the public to laugh at.  But then I also do not understand either the why or the how of texting or tweeting - you've got voicemail, right?
Agreed.

I have no Facebook or Myspace account, and if I want to communicate with someone, I phone or email them, rather than mess with a 140 character limit text message.
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

T.O.M.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,448
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2011, 09:11:26 AM »
Most Ohio courts view Facebook and MySpace as public forums, regardless of the privacy settings.  Kind of like the old saying goes, it ain't secret if more than one person knows about it.
No, I'm not mtnbkr.  ;)

a.k.a. "our resident Legal Smeagol."...thanks BryanP
"Anybody can give legal advice - but only licensed attorneys can sell it."...vaskidmark

Boomhauer

  • Former Moderator, fired for embezzlement and abuse of power
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,513
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2011, 10:00:39 AM »
Which will get you 1) fired and 2) possibly prosecuted for fraud and terroristic crimes if they catch you on that.

Yes, it is considered legal because of the security issues, public trust issues, and the general "we will be in control of every aspect of your life" issues gooberment is into these days.  Any legal challenge will be met with "Nobody is forcing you to apply for the job."

I still do not understand why anybody would want a FacePage, MyBook type account, or why folks that have them are stoopid enough to put the stuff one seems to see most often out there for the public to laugh at.  But then I also do not understand either the why or the how of texting or tweeting - you've got voicemail, right?

stay safe.

Do you realize how silly your post sounds in light of the fact that you are participating on an internet forum that has many of the same features as Facebook? And some of us LIKE to keep up with friends and family...you can't share an album of 500 photos talking over the phone, for example.

As far as texting goes, some of us use it as a very useful tool. I'd much rather receive a quick text instead of having to access my voicemail (takes about 30 seconds) and listen to the message 2 or 3 times to get the info I need from it...the text message is accessed instantly and is on the phone for future reference, and if I am around loud stuff I can read the text message instantly instead of having to shut everything down or find a quiet area and remove all of my earpro. I also text myself address, phone numbers, simple directions such from my email account instead of having to keep up with slips of paper.

So, honestly, I'm a bit tired of hearing all the curmudgeonly ramblings about Facebook or texting every time someone mentions it. It's getting old.

Quote from: Ben
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...

Quote from: bluestarlizzard
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.

OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...

Quote from: Balog
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!

mtnbkr

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15,388
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2011, 10:03:45 AM »
I still do not understand why anybody would want a FacePage, MyBook type account, or why folks that have them are stoopid enough to put the stuff one seems to see most often out there for the public to laugh at.  But then I also do not understand either the why or the how of texting or tweeting - you've got voicemail, right?

stay safe.

FB/MS/Twitter is like anything else out there, you can be stupid and get burned or use it responsibly and find it a useful tool.  I've been on FB for about 3 years now and have found it valuable for reconnecting and keeping in touch with folks I haven't seen in years.  I've also found it useful for coordinating or being made aware of events involving large numbers of people (group bike rides, my upcoming HS 20th anniversary, etc).

That said, I don't post anything I wouldn't say in a crowd of strangers and my security settings are such that if you weren't on my Friends list, you wouldn't see anything (and my name is generic enough that you're not going to identify my profile as mine without being "friended").

Since joining FB, I've had my DOD TS clearance renewed and landed a well paying job at an IT security firm.  It hasn't exactly harmed me.

Regarding texting, it's a great tool when you need to send something quick (where are you?) or can't talk (already on a conference call using another phone is a frequent usage for me).  I don't use it daily, but it has its uses.  Also, texts will go through when a voice call won't because it doesn't require real-time connectivity.  Think 9-11 or other major events.  A text saying "I'm ok" will get through when your call won't.  Imagine the value of that to your family or friends.

Chris

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,192
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2011, 02:17:42 PM »
currently, I have a "tracfone" a pay as you go cell phone.
Texting is half the price of phone calls, important in the obummer economy.

I hardly use email anymore, its so old fashioned-I use it to communicate with the last of my Luddite friends who are frightened of the 21st Century :lol:

Really, I'm not to worried that my vanilla real name facebook is going to hurt me job wise,  my "real" last name is soo dang common anyway, & my nickname is the only name most folks know me by.

My sister and my mom are really into photo's - they used to send me tons of pictures in the mail, now thanks to face book I don't have to feel guilty about not looking or caring about photo's -they "tag" me I say oooooh nice and thats that , no more looking for places to keep stuff I never look at or care about.

I can simply check up on my younger relatives without having to make a phone call ( which means a 50/60 mile round trip for me ) & I don't really like talking on the phone much.

The local town is 30 miles away, I can drive and look at the post office bulletin board or stay right here & look at the facebook page - I can drive for miles to see if some one is home or click, no phones out here - very very rural.
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,192
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2011, 02:19:09 PM »
Which will get you 1) fired and 2) possibly prosecuted for fraud and terroristic crimes if they catch you on that.

Yes, it is considered legal because of the security issues, public trust issues, and the general "we will be in control of every aspect of your life" issues gooberment is into these days.  Any legal challenge will be met with "Nobody is forcing you to apply for the job."

I still do not understand why anybody would want a FacePage, MyBook type account, or why folks that have them are stoopid enough to put the stuff one seems to see most often out there for the public to laugh at.  But then I also do not understand either the why or the how of texting or tweeting - you've got voicemail, right?

stay safe.

well, I wouldn't apply for a job that wanted to snoop thru my affairs like that
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."

BlueStarLizzard

  • Queen of the Cislords
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15,039
  • Oh please, nobody died last time...
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2011, 02:37:00 PM »
I prefer text to phone calls for just casual chatting. I hate phone calls about nothing, just keeping in touch. Texting I can watch movies or do something else instead of just talking on the phone.
"Okay, um, I'm lost. Uh, I'm angry, and I'm armed, so if you two have something that you need to work out --" -Malcolm Reynolds

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62,153
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2011, 03:24:49 PM »
Do you realize how silly your post sounds in light of the fact that you are participating on an internet forum that has many of the same features as Facebook?

Yet another reason NOT to use Facebook. I don't have anything against Facebook. I just still don't see the point of it.
Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?
--Thomas Jefferson

just Warren

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,234
  • My DJ name is Heavy Cream.
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2011, 04:17:55 PM »
I am one of those curmudgeonly types and while I've no interest in Facebook I am going to start texting  more due to the fact my phone plan is unlimited for that and my talk minutes are not.

And I'm with Avenger in that I like the idea of the information being persistent*. If I forget something I can just go read it again rather than having to make call someone back. And, yes, texting is huge plus in noisy environments.

With Swype or the same type of program from other companies texting can be quite fast and accurate. Which, since I have sausage thumbs, is a huge boon.






* If you don't or you need more secure texts for some purposes try Vapor Stream
« Last Edit: March 12, 2011, 07:06:18 PM by Warren »
Member in Good Standing of the Spontaneous Order of the Invisible Hand.

Lee

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,181
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2011, 05:25:01 PM »
I think the policy is BS.  Granted, FB is a public forum, as are other internet forums, however, I don't think they have any more right to ask for a password to read semi- private communications, then they have a right to read your diary/journal or open your mail. If they can see it, as the public does, then fine. Essentially, they are asking for a key to your front door and the right to search through all your belongings.  I think that is more fitting for a criminal investigation - not a cursory hiring practice.
 I'm an older guy that does like Facebook. You can keep in touch without getting real close ha ha.  I've touched base with a lot of people I used to know well, but haven't seen in decades. It's kinda of like putting  a message in a bottle and tossing it in the surf, but knowing exactly where the current will take it.  The recipient can choose to reply or simply toss it in the trash.  I like that. 

White Horseradish

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,792
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2011, 06:17:55 PM »
Yet another reason NOT to use Facebook. I don't have anything against Facebook. I just still don't see the point of it.
It's useful for organizing parties.
Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.

Robert A Heinlein

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34,595
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2011, 06:35:20 PM »
They could just ask the potential hires to friend them on Facebook and they can see most everything they post. 

IMO, Facebook is exactly what it says it is.  It is a social networking site.  People who would otherwise be on email or the phone all the time do that instead on Facebook.  People who don't do a lot of social networking don't.  I have a Facebook account, but I only have a few friends and a lot of relatives on it.  I could probably count on two hands the number of times in a year I log in. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34,595
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2011, 06:37:02 PM »
I agree with the point made above:  People put some really stupid stuff on line. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62,153
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2011, 06:43:15 PM »
It's useful for organizing parties.

Yeah, but what are parties good for?  :lol:  I guess that's why I'm not into Facebook. Even off line, I avoid social networking like the plague.
Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?
--Thomas Jefferson

BlueStarLizzard

  • Queen of the Cislords
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15,039
  • Oh please, nobody died last time...
Re: Background chec ==> Facebook?
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2011, 07:36:57 PM »
I'm with Lee. FB is a good way to stay semi social, with folks you don't really want to take the time to call or email (not that I email) but do want to keep up with... I.e. high school friends, that ex you have no hard feelings towards, people you've meet but don't have time to really get to know at the moment, perverted hobbits with the sense of humor of a 13 year old that are just entertaining like a high speed pile up on the interstate (  :P )

My bf and I used to go to the downtown mall (bricked pedestrian street in the middle of c-ville) to sit at one of the resterant padios on nights with heavy traffic. We'd usually see at least ten-twenty people we knew and they'd see us. We called it being 'socially antisocial' because we just sit and wait, say hi to whomever and watch them fade back into the crowd.
Facebook is kinda like the web version.
"Okay, um, I'm lost. Uh, I'm angry, and I'm armed, so if you two have something that you need to work out --" -Malcolm Reynolds