Armed Polite Society
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
R.I.P. Scout26
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Armed Polite Society
»
Main Forums
»
The Roundtable
»
Reverse the roles in this one
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Reverse the roles in this one (Read 678 times)
AZRedhawk44
friends
Senior Member
Posts: 13,987
Reverse the roles in this one
«
on:
September 05, 2011, 07:50:31 PM »
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8741895/Frenchman-ordered-to-pay-wife-damages-for-lack-of-sex.html
Imagine if this was a man suing a woman for not "putting out." And he won.
Report to moderator
Logged
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner
I reject your authoritah!
Azrael256
friend
Senior Member
Posts: 2,083
Re: Reverse the roles in this one
«
Reply #1 on:
September 05, 2011, 07:59:40 PM »
Role reversal issues aside, there is ample precedent for this one. I don't care for the "implied contract" part of it, but I don't see a problem using it as a factor in figuring a divorce settlement.
Report to moderator
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Armed Polite Society
»
Main Forums
»
The Roundtable
»
Reverse the roles in this one