I haven't seen this notion brought up anywhere. I wonder whether the SCOTUS decision to declare unconstitutional the .fed gov mandate to the states that they must fund an expanded Medicaid under Obamacare or lose all Medicaid funding, can be interpreted to mean that the .fed gov may no longer impose unfunded mandates on the states or to threaten the witholding of certain funds if the states do not comply with any sort of .fed gov mandate?