On-line training. There should be a special corner of Hell reserved for whoever came up with on-line training.
Several years ago my wife and I adopted (for reasons not pertinent to this discussion) her granddaughter. As part of the adoption process, we had to take ten hours of on-line training for potential adoptive parents -- with a test at the end of each module. Many of the modules dealt with issues such as adopting a child of a different color, different ethnicity, or different religion. Basically, since my wife had raised the kid for about 9 of her 12 years, none of that applied, so I skipped to the test and answered everything as "N/A" -- which was the correct and only honest answer.
The test results were rejected. We were informed, not very politely, that "N/A" was not an acceptable answer. After a lengthy exchange of e-mails with the testing company, they acknowledged that the classes and tests did not apply to us ... but we still had to go through the motions because "the law requires it." So they reset us to get a new access to the classes. They monitored our time, it turned out, so I called up each lesson, left it open in a window while I played Solitaire or cruised a few forums online, then I went back and answered the questions.
I have a professional license that requires a minimum number of hours of in-service training each year to keep active. I've been attending live classes. Periodically, I get a follow-up e-mail survey from the licensing agency asking a lot of inane questions that have no real answer, and ending with "Which topics do you feel would be better suited to an on-line format?" My answer is always, "None. On-line instruction is a misnomer and an anathema." I'm sure they love seeing my surveys come in.