Glock 43

[JN01]

Looks like the single stack 9mm is for real this time.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/03/daniel-zimmerman/breaking-introducing-the-glock-43-glocks-very-first-single-stack-9mm/
Trigger reach is listed as 2.56" compared to 2.76" for a Gen4 G26 without a backstrap or 2.84" with a medium backstrap (or Gen3 G26)- good for smaller hands.

[MechAg94]

Well, it is fairly thin, or at least similar to other single stacks.  I guess they finally figured they were missing a market share for concealed and back up guns.

[JN01]

And a more complete review: http://www.majorpandemic.com/2015/03/Glock-G43-9mm-Single-Stack-Pistol-Its-here.html

[Perd Hapley]

Do they make a single-stack 10mm?

[zahc]

More proof glock has been beat at their own gane in the US market. Finally instead of saying "the M&P9c is like an off-brand G26" I get to say "the G43 is like an off-brand Shield".

[roo_ster]

Do they make a single-stack 10mm?

Not that I know of.  The G29 is a compact semi-auto and double-stack like the G30.  Sized like a THICK 1911 Officer's ACP.  It shoots well.

[BryanP]

Well, they will sell.  Which means there will be people around here dumping Shields and LC9s pistols. So win win.

[lee n. field]

Looks like the single stack 9mm is for real this time.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/03/daniel-zimmerman/breaking-introducing-the-glock-43-glocks-very-first-single-stack-9mm/
Trigger reach is listed as 2.56" compared to 2.76" for a Gen4 G26 without a backstrap or 2.84" with a medium backstrap (or Gen3 G26)- good for smaller hands.

How's it compare to a PF9?

(not that I want to get rid of mine.  It works fine, for what it's good for.  Just not much fun to shoot.)

[Blakenzy]

OK, now a G26s please...

I have always thought that 9mm Glocks could be made thinner. They seem unnecessarily thick. I think that insisting on using a polymer magazine has a lot to do with it.