Breaking: White House considering Governor Sandoval for SCOTUS

[MillCreek]

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-is-vetting-gop-gov-brian-sandoval-for-scotus-seat/

At first blush, he doesn't seem to have a lot of legal experience, and I can't see any experience at the Federal appellate level.

[Ben]

Some thoughts across the interwebz are that he is cannon fodder to bait the senate.

[charby]

Some thoughts across the interwebz are that he is cannon fodder to bait the senate.

I was thinking theonion hacked a few news sites.

[Scout26]

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/white-house-is-vetting-gop-gov-brian-sandoval-for-scotus-seat/

At first blush, he doesn't seem to have a lot of legal experience, and I can't see any experience at the Federal appellate level.

He did serve at the US District level.

Sandoval has served as Nevada's governor since 2011 and the Senate unanimously confirmed him in 2005 after President George W. Bush nominated him to be a judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, which he served as until 2009.

However, the Senate Judaical Committee can still hold hearings and then vote "NO".

[lee n. field]

Sandoval has served as Nevada's governor since 2011 and the Senate unanimously confirmed him in 2005 after President George W. Bush nominated him to be a judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, which he served as until 2009.

if 0.'s handlers want him, it can't be good.

[MillCreek]

He did serve at the US District level.

However, the Senate Judaical Committee can still hold hearings and then vote "NO".

Most of the time, the SCOTUS justices have a fair amount of experience at the Federal appellate level.  It is unusual, but not unheard of, to appoint someone who only has experience at the trial court level.

[Northwoods]

No requirement for them to have any judicial or even legal experience.  Strictly speaking a new born infant is qualified.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/faq.aspx#faqgi2

[RocketMan]

I am sure McConnell wants out of the "I can't roll over" corner he has painted himself into.  Sandoval as a nominee would give McConnell that out.

[Battle Monkey of Zardoz]

He is from Reid's state of Nevada, establishment hack. Looks good on paper. So did Roberts. Obama wants him. So....*expletive deleted*ck no.

[Hawkmoon]

I am sure McConnell wants out of the "I can't roll over" corner he has painted himself into.  Sandoval as a nominee would give McConnell that out.

How?

If he said "No hearings," how would holding hearings on Sandoval be an "out"? How would it be anything other than evidence of hypocrisy?

[RocketMan]

How?

If he said "No hearings," how would holding hearings on Sandoval be an "out"? How would it be anything other than evidence of hypocrisy?

I have no doubt McConnell privately regrets making his "No hearings" commitment and is looking for a way out that won't make him look like a hypocrite.
Establishment hack and rollover artist that he is, McConnell would use the excuse, "We must make an exception for this good Republican governor that Obama has selected", and hold the approval hearings.  And you are right, it would still be hypocrisy.

[seeker_two]

No nominees PERIOD. Any hearings scheduled before November will end up costing the Republican Party its  very existence.....

[TommyGunn]

Well, Sandoval  has removed himself from consideration, so McConnel, et al, are safe.....for now.

[makattak]

Well, Sandoval  has removed himself from consideration, so McConnel, et al, are safe.....for now.

That's amazing. I figured a pro-choice "Republican" like Sandoval would LOVE to stick it to the rest of Republicans.

I'm sure "No-Labels" Huntsman would have jumped at the chance.