Marco Rubio: Still Dumb as a Sack Full of Hammers

[roo_ster]

Marco Rubio Warns Republicans: Don't Talk About Wikileaks
http://www.nbcnews.com/card/marco-rubio-warns-republicans-dont-talk-about-wikileaks-n668746

Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida is warning his fellow Republicans not to talk about the Wikileaks dump of emails stolen from Hillary Clinton's campaign chair John Podesta, breaking with the example set by Donald Trump.

"I will not discuss any issue that has become public solely on the basis of Wikileaks," said Rubio in a statement to NBC News. "As our intelligence agencies have said, these leaks are an effort by a foreign government to interfere with our electoral process and I will not indulge it."

1. The only two things Rubio has going for him are a pretty face and a name that ends in a vowel.

2. We have been presented with zero evidence that any state actor is behind wikileaks.  Just accusations.  

3. Funny how when folks drop data into the open that is damaging to conservatives or the GOP, it is "whistle blowing" done by "whistle blowers" but when the data shows Dems in a bad light, it is a "hack" likely done by Eastasia Russia.

4. I have not seen any hacks/wistleblows this cycle that could not have been achieved by non-state actors.

========================

Question:
Is Rubio one of the 2016 GOP POTUStential nominees folk claim could have easily beat HRC? 

[Jamisjockey]

I'm fully convinced that
1) Russia is behind the leaks
2) Russia is intentionally trying to influence the election.
And I'm okay with it.
Why? Because they're exposing the dirty filth that is Hillary and the DNC to it's core.
And it's in their best interests to go after the political party that could potentially cause them the most conflict down the road. We'd do (and have done) the exact same thing.

[Ron]

I'm fully convinced that
1) Russia is behind the leaks
2) Russia is intentionally trying to influence the election.
And I'm okay with it.
Why? Because they're exposing the dirty filth that is Hillary and the DNC to it's core.
And it's in their best interests to go after the political party that could potentially cause them the most conflict down the road. We'd do (and have done) the exact same thing.

Rubio is still an establishment POS.

[Perd Hapley]

I'm fully convinced that
1) Russia is behind the leaks
2) Russia is intentionally trying to influence the election.
And I'm okay with it.
Why? Because they're exposing the dirty filth that is Hillary and the DNC to it's core.

Yup.

[Scout26]

I'm fully convinced that
1) Russia is behind the leaks
2) Russia is intentionally trying to influence the election.
And I'm okay with it.
Why? Because they're exposing the dirty filth that is Hillary and the DNC to it's core.
And it's in their best interests to go after the political party that could potentially cause them the most conflict down the road. We'd do (and have done) the exact same thing.

Given what I've heard about the systems security of Democrat electronics, I wouldn't bet on a 14 year old hacker doing it on a dare from his fellow hacker buddies.   And like Jamis, I could give a *expletive deleted*it less who actually hacked them, as it goes to expose the complete lack of respect for not only the laws, but also the voters. Which is why the press and the establishment are downplaying it.  You can bet your sweet bippy that if it was GOP e-mails, there'd be 24/7 coverage all the way up until the election.  


And it once again confirms my belief that Rubio is just another DC GOPe RINO, if not worse...

Money Quote:

"I want to warn my fellow Republicans who may want to capitalize politically on these leaks," he said. "Today it is the Democrats. Tomorrow it could be us."

Because you're just as corrupt and arrogant as the DNC?

[AJ Dual]

Rubio or his handlers decided it's in their interests to try and send out low-key #nevertrump messaging to the GOPe, but to do so in a tangential way that won't directly enrage Florida Trump voters in case they manage to be a majority.

That's all this is about.

[HankB]

Wikileaks would be a non-issue if the so called "press" did investigative reporting like they used to a couple of generations ago. Instead, we have potty-mouthed tapes of Trump being released while NBC sits on (suppresses!) old tapes of a Juanita Broderick interview in which she credibly accuses Bill Clinton of rape and Hillary as part of the cover up.

[MechAg94]

Wikileaks would be a non-issue if the so called "press" did investigative reporting like they used to a couple of generations ago. Instead, we have potty-mouthed tapes of Trump being released while NBC sits on (suppresses!) old tapes of a Juanita Broderick interview in which she credibly accuses Bill Clinton of rape and Hillary as part of the cover up.

The Clintons would have never gone anywhere in politics if they didn't have friendly treatment in the press.  They have been getting it for decades.

[makattak]

The Clintons would have never gone anywhere in politics if they didn't have friendly treatment in the press.  They have been getting it for decades.

According to one study, American politics would resemble Kansas if the press were unbiased.

You got to hand it to the leftists, though. The are in it for the long haul. Infiltrate slowly until you take the institution over and turn it to your own purposes.