They probably force sperm donors to take responsibility for the resulting child no matter the circumstances.
Which pretty much points out the lie of the second link. This isn't a man who is having the child. Just a woman disguised as a man.
This. The headline that suckered me in was about a "man" who is four months pregnant, and I thought that would be of some interest. Imagine my disappointment when I realized it's just a woman with gender confusion issues. Once I realized that, the only part of interest was that he/she/it is unemployed and that the taxpayers are going to foot the bill for his/her/its gender reassignment. I don't think that's right. If she wants to be come a he (sort of, to the extent possible) I don't have a quarrel with that. I just think he/she/it should pay for it.
It also ocurs to me that SJWs today seem to like putting the female first (at least, those who don't use artificial, made-up pronouns to confuse everyone still more), so perhaps it should be she/he/it. But the abbreviated version of that, perhaps appropriately, would be s/h/it.
