But, Yale is behind it, so we shouldn't be surprised.
http://www.wtnh.com/news/military/employers-urged-not-to-hold-discharge-status-against-vets/1130383614Connecticut is now claiming (thanks to Yale?) that employers cannot hold bad conduct discharges against job applicants because (says Connecticut) the military handed out disproportionate numbers of bad conduct discharges to blacks, Latinos, and gays. So exactly how is an employer supposed to evaluate a veteran's service if he (the employer) isn't allowed to take into account the fact that the applicant was kicked out of the service with the worst possible type of discharge?
Applicant: "My First Sergeant, Platoon Leader, Company Commander and Brigade Commander d'in like me, so they made up a bunch of *expletive deleted*it and kicked me out."
Employer: "Okay, thanks for setting that straight. When would you like to start, and would you prefer a corner office, or one with a view of Central Park?"
I'd have to check but, if I remember correctly, jobs offering preference points for military service
by law don't apply to discharges under less than honorable conditions.