Author Topic: Big Sister  (Read 1562 times)

CAnnoneer

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,136
Big Sister
« on: March 21, 2007, 03:05:09 PM »
"It only hurts, 'cause it's true."

Here is the link to the video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dN8kXkv6JQo

Note that the article did not link it.

Quote
Mystery creator of anti-Clinton ad ID'd By JIM KUHNHENN, Associated Press Writer
28 minutes ago
 

WASHINGTON - The mystery creator of the Orwellian YouTube ad against        Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Democratic operative who worked for a digital consulting firm with ties to rival Sen. Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record).

ADVERTISEMENT
 
Philip de Vellis, a strategist with Blue State Digital, acknowledged in an interview with The Associated Press that he was the creator of the video, which portrayed Clinton as a Big Brother figure and urged support for Obama's presidential campaign.

De Vellis said he resigned from the firm on Wednesday after he learned that he was about to be unmasked by the HuffingtonPost.com., a liberal news and opinion Internet site.

Blue State designed Obama's Web site and one of the firm's founding members, Joe Rospars, took a leave from the company to work as Obama's director of new media.

"It's true ... yeah, it's me," de Vellis said Wednesday evening.

He said he produced the ad outside of work and that neither Blue State nor the Obama campaign was aware of his role in the ad.

"But it raises some eyebrows, so I thought it best that I resign and not put them in that position."

In a statement released Wednesday evening, the Obama campaign said:

"The Obama campaign and its employees had no knowledge and had nothing to do with the creation of the ad. We were notified this evening by a vendor of ours, Blue State Digital, that an employee of the company had been involved in the making of this ad. Blue State Digital has separated ties with this individual and we have been assured he did no work on our campaign's account."

The Clinton campaign had no immediate comment.

The connection to the Obama camp, however, poses a public relations problem for the campaign. Obama has argued that he is a different type of presidential candidate who rejects negative politics.

The ad was guerrilla politics at its cleverest and had become the boffo hit of the YouTube Web site.

The 74-second clip, a copy of a 1984 Apple ad for its        Macintosh computer, has recorded nearly 1.5 million views, with an enormous surge in the past two days. The video's final image reads "BarackObama.com."

De Vellis remained hidden for weeks, protected by the anonymity afforded by YouTube and the absence of federal regulations governing most Internet political speech.

The ad portrayed Clinton on a huge television screen addressing robotic humans in a stark, futuristic hall. A female athlete tosses a hammer at the screen, destroying Clinton's image with an explosive flash. Then this text: "On January 14th the Democratic primary will begin. And you will see why 2008 isn't going to be like '1984.'"

De Vellis said he used footage of an updated Apple ad that portrayed the female athlete wearing an iPod. He said he used standard Apple equipment to modify the video and edit Clinton's image into the clip.

Obama, appearing on CNN's "Larry King Live" Monday night, said his campaign knew nothing about the origins of the anti-Clinton ad.

"Frankly, given what it looks like, we don't have the technical capacity to create something like this," he said. "It's pretty extraordinary."

Sindawe

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,938
  • Vashneesht
Re: Big Sister
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2007, 03:20:36 PM »
When I saw the anti-Clinton add on YouTube, I could help but be reminded of a similar add for Planet Express.  Of course, MOM had better script writers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNru2SGZSms
I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Re: Big Sister
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2007, 03:33:38 PM »
What's with the logo at the end of the "ad"?

MattC

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
Re: Big Sister
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2007, 04:50:57 PM »
Headless, it modifies the Apple logo at the time into an "O" for Obama.  Seems like they are going for the effect that the Bush campaign developed with "W".

Sergeant Bob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,861
Re: Big Sister
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2007, 11:27:12 AM »
Headless, it modifies the Apple logo at the time into an "O" for Obama.  Seems like they are going for the effect that the Bush campaign developed with "W".
Looks just like a Zero to me. grin
Personally, I do not understand how a bunch of people demanding a bigger govt can call themselves anarchist.
I meet lots of folks like this, claim to be anarchist but really they're just liberals with pierced genitals. - gunsmith

I already have canned butter, buying more. Canned blueberries, some pancake making dry goods and the end of the world is gonna be delicious.  -French G

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Big Sister
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2007, 11:29:11 AM »
Now if someone would just spoof the Men's Wearhouse ads to target Obama.

"When you need an empty suit..."

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,509
  • My prepositions are on/in
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Re: Big Sister
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2007, 01:00:04 PM »
Headless, it modifies the Apple logo at the time into an "O" for Obama.  Seems like they are going for the effect that the Bush campaign developed with "W".
Yeah, I got that it was a variation on Apple's logo.  My question is, why?

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Big Sister
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2007, 02:37:15 PM »
Headless, it modifies the Apple logo at the time into an "O" for Obama.  Seems like they are going for the effect that the Bush campaign developed with "W".
Yeah, I got that it was a variation on Apple's logo.  My question is, why?

Because they thought they were being cool. All they did was create a knockout matte over the screen area of the original commercial. It's not difficult at all what they did. Pretty much one evening in Final Cut.

And Apple can sue their a$$ off for it.  grin