If the current is DC, how does that change the lethal votage?
I would be concerned about low spots on the track having a high water level myself. Are they all at the same level?
Well, there is (or was) a rather deep drainage channel between the two main tracks, but the way they're talking the water is deeper than that. Since they're building the railroad in a pre-dug tunnel, they could keep things level throughout, except maybe in the Bronx. I remember, though, there was one station with three levels.
Kinda bothers me that with that much voltage, there should be a
lot of H
2 and O
2 being generated. Hence my deeper curiosity about the whole affair.
In terms of Lethal Voltage, once again there are a lot of factors involved. I guess people have survived direct lightning hits (or so said the media), yet trees are blown apart by the sudden heat generating high-pressure steam inside the tree itself. And getting zapped by five kiloVolts generated by rubbing your feet across the carpet is generally harmless.
You can also have a voltage source reading 50 volts on your meter, but with very high spikes which get averaged out.
I believe AC up to "skin effect" frequencies, is considered more dangerous because of the repeated and rapid muscle twitching, including in the heart muscle if it's in the pathway, but don't put that down as sworn testimony. It's just my off-the-cuff reaction to the question. I suppose if you could get enough direct current through the chest cavity, that would block the heartbeat impulses --again, offhanded.
And skin-effect frequencies, if they don't kill you, leave a rather painful and persistent burn. That, I can testify about personally.
So while it's true that it's the current that kills, that statement
must be qualified by a bunch of other factors or it's meaningless.
I await better data from those more qualified.