Tecumseh said:
This is just another reason to vote for Ron Paul, he is the only GOP candidate that can beat Hillary or Obama. If he is not on the ballot I will still vote for him by writing his name in.
When Paul starts beating Giuliani in the primaries, then I'll be willing to say he has more than a snowball's chance to get the nomination. But
win the Presidency? No. Frickin'. Way. Actually, I take that back--he doesn't have a chance at even the Republican nomination--Paul's views on limited government are as much a threat to the GOP's largesse as they are to the Democrats socialist ideas. The War on Terror, The War on Drugs, Homeland Security, these are multibillion dollar industries whose leaders will
not allow them to be scaled back or even revealed for the scams that they are. In fact, I'll go so far as to say the GOP would rather lose the Oval office, and thus gain momentum for 2012 with the usual themes, than to back a libertarian who would force them to reconfigure their platform.
The GOP vehicle is broken, but the Republicans would rather have a broken-down Hummer than a running Focus.
And I'm not sure America as a whole is ready for libertarian reform.
All that being said, I'd vote for him. Not that I think he could fix America, but because only then would Americans wake up to see how far we've strayed from the ideals that started this country.