Main Forums > Politics

N.Y. Senator Pushes For Cameras On Cop Handguns

(1/3) > >>

wmenorr67:

--- Quote ---ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) ― In a flash, a police officer draws a handgun from its holster. Less than two seconds later, a red laser and bright light shine at whatever is in the gun barrel's path while a mini-camera records it all.

That's how mini-cams on police handguns would work under a proposal gaining support in New York, which would be the first state in the nation to require the technology. State police were briefed on the technology and are reviewing it for a possible pilot program, said Michael Balboni, the state's deputy secretary for public safety.

The device could create a critical visual and audio record of police shootings for use in court, said state Sen. Eric Adams, a Brooklyn Democrat and former police officer. He is drumming up support for testing the cameras with the state police SWAT squad.

Adams said recordings from the $695 cameras couldn't be altered by a police officer and would quell many questions after controversial police shootings, like the deaths in New York City of Amadou Diallo in 1999 and Sean Bell in 2006.

"That's definitely a new thing," said Meredith Mays of the International Association of Chiefs of Police based in Virginia. She said police have known the technology existed, but no state has required it.

Some police departments have put cameras on Tasers in the last couple years, but there is no major national effort by police to seek or block gun cameras at the federal level, according to the National Association of Police Organizations, a major lobbyist.

"We believe the state of New York can lead the country," said Adams, who retired after 21 years as a New York police officer. "There no longer can be a question mark that lingers after shootings."

Adams, who was never involved in a shooting, said the lights on the 5-ounce camera could be turned off if they would expose the officer to danger in a dark area. But the camera and optional audio recorder would remain operating for up to 60 minutes.

He said the images would also help identify suspects who get away. He wants a pilot program that would allow testing by police at shooting ranges. That could lead to a law mandating the gun cameras, he said.

Adams knows many police won't embrace the idea at first.
There was no immediate comment from the police department and police officers union in New York City. Mayor Michael Bloomberg's office said it will review any legislation that comes from Adams' effort.

But in Albany, there is growing support.

Republican Sen. Dale Volker of Erie County, a former police officer who would be critical to passing the Democrat-backed bill, already sought funding for a pilot program. But that $300,000 request to test the technology in state police SWAT squads was cut in the budget this spring as part of efforts to close a deficit of about $5 billion.

"You have to understand, particularly in urban areas today, it is not like the old days when if someone was shot you went before a grand jury," said Volker. Today, he said, an officer would also face intense media and community attention.

"It's a different world," he said. "It's not even a matter of right and wrong a lot of times. It's that people decide very often whatever you did was probably wrong."

In the Democrat-led Assembly, Adams and his colleagues in the influential black, Hispanic and Asian caucus like the idea.
The gun camera is made by Legend Technologies, based in the Adirondack mountains town of Keesville, N.Y.
http://wcbstv.com/local/police.handgun.cameras.2.722036.html

If they do it for the police just think how soon it would take to make it mandatory on the general public.

Don't see it working to well though.  Imagine the muzzle flash would effect the camera to some extent.

Plus think of the new holsters that will have to be made and bought to hold the pistol.

Regolith:
Not to mention the fact that the recoil would beat the cameras to death rather quickly.  Either replacing the cameras or getting cameras that can withstand the beating would be fairly expensive.

El Tejon:
I remember reading a gun rag back in '89 or so that had a sarcastic article on a police pistol of the future.  A camera was on the futuristic weapon.

If cameras were put on guns, the video would go "missing" all the time.

I'm currently fighting West Lafayette police on this.  They put video in their cars, but fail to disclose that in the police reports and the prosecution has sent me e-mails denying the existence of video.  Caught their cops stepping on their you-know-whats in a May 2nd deposition.  We'll see what happens.

Video Police=>

Manedwolf:
Yeah, that'd be a really useful recording. A couple of seconds of blurry motion of a suspect moving, a whiteout and a glimpse of at least 45 degrees up angle, then another blur, another whiteout...

You can really tell who knows nothing about guns.

Standing Wolf:
Why don't we put cameras on politicians?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page