Author Topic: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama  (Read 44424 times)

DaveBeal

  • New Member
  • Posts: 18
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #25 on: September 25, 2008, 07:02:25 AM »
Quote
If that wasn't a drive by, I don't know what is.

Just because I don't quibble with every detail of your rebuttals doesn't mean I'm not reading them.  I don't think turning the thread into a p***ing contest serves much of a purpose.

Guys, all I did was follow the NRA's own references on its website and note that in some cases, they don't support the NRA's categorical statements.  My guess is that the NRA figures that people will see the footnotes on its webpage and say "Well, it's documented, so it must be true" without actually following the links.

And for what it's worth, I'm just a shooter who is likely to vote for Obama.  I have no association with his campaign.  I'm even a member of the NRA although I'm not likely to renew next year, because of the misrepresentations I've noted.  I'm new to APS, but I've been reading and posting on THR for about a year.

Pb

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,904
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #26 on: September 25, 2008, 07:20:58 AM »
Here's proof of Obama's support for the DC's gun laws:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wu9jE1MnAE

Keep in mind that Obama refused to sign of congress' statement of support for overturning the laws.  McCain did sign.

Keep in mind the DC's law were a total ban on self-defense with a gun in any way, shape or form.  If you were being stabbed to death by an intruder in your house, it would have been illegal for you to crawl over to your gun safe, unlock it, and re-assemble your shotgun for use in self-defense.

Obama supported this BS.  I cannot believe you are taken in by this man.  Watch the video I linked.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #27 on: September 25, 2008, 07:23:31 AM »
And for what it's worth, I'm just a shooter who is likely to vote for Obama. 

What do you shoot? What kind of gun?

Maybe you'd prefer CNN's election center factfinding, since they're in the bag for Obama?

Quote
Calls for permanently reinstating assault weapons ban. Voted for 2005 amendment placing restrictions on rifle ammunition that is "designed or marketed" to be armor-piercing.

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/issues.gun.html

Pb

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,904
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #28 on: September 25, 2008, 07:25:14 AM »
Oh, and McCain voted against the AWB two times.  He still opposes it.

Obama's old website supported banning all semi-automatic guns, as well as a federal ban on CCW.  I saw it myself.  He's had those positions removed from his website.

What has Obama ever done that was pro-second ammendment?  Tell us that please!

DaveBeal

  • New Member
  • Posts: 18
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #29 on: September 25, 2008, 07:36:02 AM »
Quote
Quote
And for what it's worth, I'm just a shooter who is likely to vote for Obama.

What do you shoot? What kind of gun?

Mainly a S&W Model 41 and a Beretta 92FS.  Why do you ask?

Quote
Calls for permanently reinstating assault weapons ban. Voted for 2005 amendment placing restrictions on rifle ammunition that is "designed or marketed" to be armor-piercing.

I never claimed that Obama is against an AWB.  And thank you for confirming that the amendment he voted for targeted rifle ammunition only if it was intended to be armor-piercing.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #30 on: September 25, 2008, 07:39:42 AM »
Quote
Quote
And for what it's worth, I'm just a shooter who is likely to vote for Obama.

What do you shoot? What kind of gun?

Mainly a S&W Model 41 and a Beretta 92FS.  Why do you ask?


Because Obama has SAID that he would ban both. All semiautos.

Quote
I never claimed that Obama is against an AWB.  And thank you for confirming that the amendment he voted for targeted rifle ammunition only if it was intended to be armor-piercing.

ALL RIFLE AMMO IS ARMOR-PIERCING. A generic 30-06 ball will defeat police armor!

And just to confirm...you're okay with an AWB? That's what it sounds like.

He's not just not "against" it, he is FOR it. He WANTS one to be permanent. Don't muddle words. I'm sick of Democrats twisting words like that.

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #31 on: September 25, 2008, 07:43:47 AM »
Quote
I never claimed that Obama is against an AWB.  And thank you for confirming that the amendment he voted for targeted rifle ammunition only if it was intended to be armor-piercing.

And for an amendment that would ban all ammo that can fit in a pistol and pierce body armor.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

DaveBeal

  • New Member
  • Posts: 18
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #32 on: September 25, 2008, 07:52:33 AM »
Quote
ALL RIFLE AMMO IS ARMOR-PIERCING. A generic 30-06 ball will defeat police armor!

Why do you guys keep ignoring the phrase "designed or marketed as having armor piercing capability" in the amendment for which Obama voted?  Just being capable of piercing armor wasn't sufficient for rifle ammunition to be banned.

Quote
And just to confirm...you're okay with an AWB? That's what it sounds like.

I think there are more important issues facing our country.  I don't get to build my own candidate by selecting one option on each possible issue.  I only get to choose between two viable alternatives.

Quote
And for an amendment that would ban all ammo that can fit in a pistol and pierce body armor.

True, but that's not the part of the amendment that the NRA attacked.


Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #33 on: September 25, 2008, 07:54:54 AM »
Quote
And just to confirm...you're okay with an AWB? That's what it sounds like.

I think there are more important issues facing our country.

Okay, now I think you're an Obama campaign worker.

That's a quacking Dem question-duck if I've ever seen one.

Quit ducking. Are you okay with an AWB? YES OR NO.

wmenorr67

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,775
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #34 on: September 25, 2008, 07:56:01 AM »

I think there are more important issues facing our country.


True and letting me decide how to spend my own hard earned money is one of those.
There are five things, above all else, that make life worth living: a good relationship with God, a good woman, good health, good friends, and a good cigar.

Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier.  One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Bacon is the candy bar of meats!

Only the dead have seen the end of war!

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #35 on: September 25, 2008, 07:57:33 AM »
What issues do you feel are more pressing than keeping the 2A? And why do you feel Obama would be better?
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

DaveBeal

  • New Member
  • Posts: 18
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #36 on: September 25, 2008, 07:58:39 AM »
Quote
Quit ducking. Are you okay with an AWB? YES OR NO.

A new AWB wouldn't bother me.

But the topic under discussion is the accuracy of the NRA's statements about Obama, not my political opinions.

wmenorr67

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,775
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #37 on: September 25, 2008, 07:59:51 AM »
Quote
Quit ducking. Are you okay with an AWB? YES OR NO.

A new AWB wouldn't bother me.


How so?
There are five things, above all else, that make life worth living: a good relationship with God, a good woman, good health, good friends, and a good cigar.

Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier.  One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.

Bacon is the candy bar of meats!

Only the dead have seen the end of war!

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #38 on: September 25, 2008, 08:01:04 AM »
Quote
Quit ducking. Are you okay with an AWB? YES OR NO.

A new AWB wouldn't bother me.

But the topic under discussion is the accuracy of the NRA's statements about Obama, not my political opinions.


No, it IS relevant.

Because you just invalidated your political opinions by saying that.

Take your thousand dollar target pistol and go sit with the rest of the old FUDDs down at the BS sporting goods store.

FUDD. You're worse than antis. You do more damage than they ever could because you rot the meaning of the 2A from within.

Just wait till they come for your guns. You won't get any help from those of us who wanted to keep our ARs and AKs.  angry

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #39 on: September 25, 2008, 08:04:21 AM »
Quote
Quit ducking. Are you okay with an AWB? YES OR NO.

A new AWB wouldn't bother me.

But the topic under discussion is the accuracy of the NRA's statements about Obama, not my political opinions.


The source's bias is important. An article from HuffPo or World Net Daily would be viewed much more sceptically because of the serious bias of the source. Someone who claims to give a *expletive deleted*it about the 2nd but obviously doesn't is also a source of scepticism.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

DaveBeal

  • New Member
  • Posts: 18
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #40 on: September 25, 2008, 08:04:49 AM »
When I don't respond to your rebuttals, you call it a drive-by.  When I do, we get completely off topic.

Anybody wanna discuss the NRA website?

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #41 on: September 25, 2008, 08:08:30 AM »
Anybody wanna discuss the NRA website?

No. Why do you care? You don't stand for what they stand for anyway.

You don't even understand what the second amendment is for.

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #42 on: September 25, 2008, 08:11:18 AM »
Anybody wanna discuss the NRA website?

Some of the claims are phrased poorly. Your attempts to twist the "armor piercing" thing are amusing in their yoga master levels of contortion.

Thread drift is a way of life here. Deal with it or leave.

So why are you ok with an AWB? And what problems do you think are so pressing, and how will Obama fix them?
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

hoosier8

  • New Member
  • Posts: 9
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #43 on: September 25, 2008, 08:14:21 AM »
Here is a collection of Obama's position statements.

http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,411
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #44 on: September 25, 2008, 08:32:05 AM »
Anybody wanna discuss the NRA website?

No.

Me either.  I'd rather discuss your opposition to my basic rights. 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #45 on: September 25, 2008, 08:33:50 AM »
Quote
Quit ducking. Are you okay with an AWB? YES OR NO.

A new AWB wouldn't bother me.

But the topic under discussion is the accuracy of the NRA's statements about Obama, not my political opinions.


The NRA is not running for elected office. Obama is.

Obama would support a new AWB. Most of the posters here are not fine with any new gun laws. Some of us think gun laws in America are too strict.

Why would we support Obama?
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #46 on: September 25, 2008, 08:34:55 AM »
Quote
True, but that's not the part of the amendment that the NRA attacked.

.30-30 can fit in a pistol and will pierce body armor. It will be banned under that part.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #47 on: September 25, 2008, 08:36:55 AM »
Quote
True, but that's not the part of the amendment that the NRA attacked.

.30-30 can fit in a pistol and will pierce body armor. It will be banned under that part.

So can anything that can fit in an HK 91/93 clone, AK pistol, or Contender. That's, oh, right...everything.

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #48 on: September 25, 2008, 08:40:53 AM »
Quote
True, but that's not the part of the amendment that the NRA attacked.

.30-30 can fit in a pistol and will pierce body armor. It will be banned under that part.

So can anything that can fit in an HK 91/93 clone, AK pistol, or Contender. That's, oh, right...everything.




But being as this is a .50 BMG, the most powerful rifle round in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya punk?
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

DaveBeal

  • New Member
  • Posts: 18
Re: NRA's Inaccurate Statements about Obama
« Reply #49 on: September 25, 2008, 08:50:13 AM »
Quote
Here is a collection of Obama's position statements.

http://www.ontheissues.org/domestic/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm

Thanks for posting this, hoosier.