Author Topic: 38/22 wildcat  (Read 2538 times)

gary mills

  • New Member
  • Posts: 2
38/22 wildcat
« on: October 26, 2008, 03:02:55 AM »
Can anyone tell me if this has been done before looking to produce 22cal based on 38special/ 357mag dont know if this is a viable option but suits as a project with things on hand

K Frame

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44,779
  • I Am Inimical
Re: 38/22 wildcat
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2008, 09:18:18 AM »
Yes.

It was called the .22 Remington Jet Magnum, and it was a lovely failure.

Remington and Smith & Wesson conspired to put it in the Model 53 pistol, where it would occasionally cause the gun to lock up because of shoulder set back. It also didn't have ballistics anywhere near what was initially claimed.


Around the same time Winchester offered the .256 Winchester Magnum, a .357 case necked down. It is also now obsolete.
Carbon Monoxide, sucking the life out of idiots, 'tards, and fools since man tamed fire.

mtnbkr

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15,388
Re: 38/22 wildcat
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2008, 09:21:04 AM »
Dunno about the 22, but the 256winmag is popular in the Contender.

There are lots of odd wildcats and such in that platform.  You might check over at http://specialtypistols.infopop.cc...

Chris

K Frame

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44,779
  • I Am Inimical
Re: 38/22 wildcat
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2008, 09:34:12 AM »
What, there were four sold last year?  :laugh:

It always was popular in the T/C, but that wasn't enough to keep Winchester from dropping it from production in the early 1990s.

Functionally, the .256 is obsolete. It's not too terribly hard to form from .357 Mag. cases, though.
Carbon Monoxide, sucking the life out of idiots, 'tards, and fools since man tamed fire.

gary mills

  • New Member
  • Posts: 2
Re: 38/22 wildcat
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2008, 11:56:41 PM »
thanks for the input looks like i should abandone this for somthing more sensible

RaspberrySurprise

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,020
  • Yub yub Commander
Re: 38/22 wildcat
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2008, 12:13:36 AM »
What are you trying to accomplish? If we knew we might be able to help.
Look, tiny text!

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: 38/22 wildcat
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2008, 11:20:13 AM »
What are you trying to accomplish? If we knew we might be able to help.

Producing a cartridge with the cost of a .44-40 and the ballistics of a .22 magnum ...?

 :laugh:
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

Brad Johnson

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,145
  • Witty, charming, handsome, and completely insane.
Re: 38/22 wildcat
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2008, 03:46:07 PM »
There's the .25 NAA (a necked-down .32 ACP cartridge) and the and .32 NAA (a necked-down .380 ACP).

Necking down a .38 to .22 is going to be awfully hard on the case.  If nothing else I'd use a .357 case for the extra length.

You can develop your own cartridge dimensions and have dies custom cut for them.  Happens all the time.

Brad
It's all about the pancakes, people.
"And he thought cops wouldn't chase... a STOLEN DONUT TRUCK???? That would be like Willie Nelson ignoring a pickup full of weed."
-HankB

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: 38/22 wildcat
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2008, 05:42:28 PM »
Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536