Author Topic: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....  (Read 14558 times)

wacki

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« on: October 29, 2008, 11:59:32 PM »
Obama is planning on spending $500 billion on a civilian army.

Quote
“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set,” he said Wednesday. “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.”

Maybe this is why:

Posse Comitatus Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

Thoughts?

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2008, 12:16:10 AM »
Don't worry, it's only to help old ladies across the street.
"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.

Monkeyleg

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,589
  • Tattaglia is a pimp.
    • http://www.gunshopfinder.com
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2008, 01:05:26 AM »
Gee, the Boy Scouts didn't have M4's when I was a member. :(

seeker_two

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,922
  • In short, most intelligence is false.
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2008, 06:31:03 AM »
Wow...a massive, paramilitary-style federal LEO agency under a Democratic President.....that certainly makes all of us living near Waco feel safer.....
Impressed yet befogged, they grasped at his vivid leading phrases, seeing only their surface meaning, and missing the deeper current of his thought.

El Tejon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,641
    • http://www.kirkfreemanlaw.com
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2008, 08:23:17 AM »
Red Guards. :mad:

For the utopia that Socialism brings, it sure does take a lot of violence. =D
I do not smoke pot, wear Wookie suits, live in my mom's basement, collect unemployment checks or eat Cheetoes, therefore I am not a Ron Paul voter.

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2008, 08:35:37 AM »
Obama is planning on spending $500 billion on a civilian army.

Maybe this is why:

Posse Comitatus Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

Thoughts?

Okay you're going to have to provide something to back up that statement. 
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,738
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2008, 09:17:11 AM »
I am surprised he said that again.  Anyone have a link to a transcript?
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

T.O.M.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,407
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2008, 09:28:31 AM »
I've read in a few places that he's made statements to this effect, and even saw one badly made video in which it sounds like he said something about a civilian guard.  IN the video, though, you could barely hear the voice over crowd noise and static, and conveniently, his head turned so you could not see his face.

Anyone got a source for this?  A good, reliable source, though those seem to be getting harder and harder to find... =(
No, I'm not mtnbkr.  ;)

a.k.a. "our resident Legal Smeagol."...thanks BryanP
"Anybody can give legal advice - but only licensed attorneys can sell it."...vaskidmark

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,866
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2008, 09:36:57 AM »
So now I need to start worriing about the third ammendment too?  Great, just great.

ctdonath

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #9 on: October 30, 2008, 01:58:03 PM »
The actual quote was odd in context, and means something completely different out of context.
The speech it occurred in was entirely about public service, and the quote suggested a large-scale Peace Corp, soup-kitchen, Habitat For Humanity kind of "army". Apparently the idea was to, just like the Army can drop a brigade anywhere in short order to promptly beat a government & military into submission, have a similar group that can drop in anywhere and [re]build infrastructure & social support in short order. (Some merit: in Iraq, we completed the first government-toppling process in mere days, but the subsequent years were largely due to an inability to restore order & infrastructure quickly.)

Bizzarely, the actual paragraph in question was NOT in his prepared text. No word on whether it was on the teleprompter or not. It sounds very different from the rest of the prepared text, only shows up in some transcripts, and is obviously very strangely worded given the context.

Other obvious problems aside, it shows BHO is not insightful enough to know how some phrases will come across as "loaded" to a great many people. He may have meant a big domestic charity, but it came across as US Ghestapo.
Now reading: The Unthinkable, The Age of Innocence
Recently read: 1491

Rudy Kohn

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 141
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #10 on: October 30, 2008, 02:44:43 PM »
The quote I think the OP was talking about is this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHmecy94z-M

...in which Obama states, "...We've gotta have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the military]."

It was the subject of a recent topic here posted in Politics by the member Physics.
http://www.armedpolitesociety.com/index.php?topic=15129.0

The youtube video linked above doesn't provide a lot of context for the statement, I admit, but you can see his face and hear him well.
I'm not sure what speech he was in the middle of in the video.

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,738
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #11 on: October 30, 2008, 03:20:24 PM »
The actual quote was odd in context, and means something completely different out of context.
The speech it occurred in was entirely about public service, and the quote suggested a large-scale Peace Corp, soup-kitchen, Habitat For Humanity kind of "army". Apparently the idea was to, just like the Army can drop a brigade anywhere in short order to promptly beat a government & military into submission, have a similar group that can drop in anywhere and [re]build infrastructure & social support in short order. (Some merit: in Iraq, we completed the first government-toppling process in mere days, but the subsequent years were largely due to an inability to restore order & infrastructure quickly.)

Bizzarely, the actual paragraph in question was NOT in his prepared text. No word on whether it was on the teleprompter or not. It sounds very different from the rest of the prepared text, only shows up in some transcripts, and is obviously very strangely worded given the context.

Other obvious problems aside, it shows BHO is not insightful enough to know how some phrases will come across as "loaded" to a great many people. He may have meant a big domestic charity, but it came across as US Ghestapo.
Well, "National Security Force" does not mean the same thing as "National Peace Corps" at all.  Plus, in order to do what you mention in your example about Iraq, it would need to be mostly military types and be essentially an occupation force.  There is no other way to do it.  You can't just drop a large support organization into an area without a lot of protection not to mention fighting guerrillas.  Think about all the contract security in Iraq and that is what you would end up with.  You might as well just add a Humanitarian Aide branch of the military, but we already have that. 

Now if you are talking about a domestic National Peace Corps, whatever would those people do?  Would it replace FEMA?  Would it be some giant public works organization?  Would it be something more serious?

You explanation doesn't help much.  :)
Not to mention the idea that someone like Obama would likely expect the military to gut its funding in order to "pay" for this.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2008, 03:34:16 PM by MechAg94 »
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

ctdonath

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2008, 03:28:44 PM »
Quote
I'm not sure what speech he was in the middle of in the video.

I am, I read the transcripts & heard the speech when the flap started, and the whole point was public service, not military service.

Quote
You explanation doesn't help much.

No it doesn't, because the quote is indeed kind of strange in-context. AFAIK, he just improvised it when delivering the prepared statements, and it sounded like he did. Given the context, he clearly wasn't talking about anything militaristic, yet the very words he used sound exactly that way.

Just another example of how unready he is to be President. We can't have a prez who so easily says such strange things that can instantly destabilize domestic and foreign affairs.

Trust me, I'm not trying to justify or promote what he said - I'm just concerned that there's a lot of emotional energy & misunderstanding about something discussed wildly out of context and badly misinterpreted. ...then again, if he really meant what those words indicate, we're in for Chinese-curse-type interesting times...
Now reading: The Unthinkable, The Age of Innocence
Recently read: 1491

buzz_knox

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2008, 04:03:28 PM »
I think what this really means is that as he gets closer to his "destiny," he is letting more of his true self out.  Civilian security forces (possibly with a cabinet position head), redistribution of wealth, etc., are all part of his core ideology, formed from years of being a closet and not so closet Marxist.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2008, 05:00:00 PM »
Just another example of how unready he is to be President. We can't have a prez who so easily says such strange things that can instantly destabilize domestic and foreign affairs.

Babblin' Biden the Gaffe-Master sure won't help much.

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #15 on: October 30, 2008, 06:52:38 PM »
Don't we already have something called VISTA ???
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

slingshot

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,031
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #16 on: October 30, 2008, 08:48:21 PM »
He needs a massive well funded military machine inside the US so that gun confiscations can go forward after the proper laws are crafted and passed.  He really needs to rethink this objective.

Sounds like Nazi Germany pre-WWII.
It shall be as it was in the past... Not with dreams, but with strength and with courage... Shall a nation be molded to last. (The Plainsman, 1936)

wacki

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #17 on: October 30, 2008, 09:12:08 PM »
Okay you're going to have to provide something to back up that statement. 

what the 500 billion?  there are plenty of videos of him talking about it.  Apparently he mentioned it last night as well:

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/31747_Obamas_Civilian_National_Security_Force

Can't seem to find my favorite video right now... :-(

As for the reasons?  I have know clue.  The wikipedia article was simply a hypothesis.

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,179
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #18 on: October 30, 2008, 10:06:34 PM »
Dear God, please spare us!
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #19 on: October 30, 2008, 10:43:50 PM »
what the 500 billion?  there are plenty of videos of him talking about it.  Apparently he mentioned it last night as well:

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/31747_Obamas_Civilian_National_Security_Force

Can't seem to find my favorite video right now... :-(

As for the reasons?  I have know clue.  The wikipedia article was simply a hypothesis.

Okay, I'm just as paranoid as the next guy, but I see nothing in there about compulsory service, nor about brownshirts with armbands coming through neighborhoods making us wear (R)'s on our shirts.  Just about people working off the government dole while the rich get taxed into the Caribbean.
This shits almost as weak as the whole birth certificate flap.
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

wacki

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #20 on: October 31, 2008, 12:28:36 AM »
Okay, I'm just as paranoid as the next guy, but I see nothing in there about compulsory service, nor about brownshirts with armbands coming through neighborhoods making us wear (R)'s on our shirts.  Just about people working off the government dole while the rich get taxed into the Caribbean.
This shits almost as weak as the whole birth certificate flap.

I didn't say it definitely would be.  That being said do you think Obama would actually come out and say what you are looking for?  Obama always seems to attack things from the side while disarming the public with his words.  Look at his past attempts to destroy the second amendment.  He claims he supports our traditions while refusing to sign the pro-Heller amicus brief, bribes law reviews to write cover to cover anti-2A journals and funds shame science that gets published in prestigious medical journals.   Oh and he votes to bans cop-killer pistol bullets and by cop killer pistol bullets I mean the ".30-30" the ".223" and the "7.62".  Yup, he sure supports our "traditions".

I know I'm being paranoid and I was being somewhat facetious when I posted this thread.  I just find it curious that he compares this "security force" to the military in so many ways.  His analogies and comparisons are sending up red flags in my mind.  In the end I doubt it will amount to much. Then again I doubted Obama would get this far.  So my ability to predict the future is not to be relied upon.  I generally prepare for the worst but hope for the best.

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #21 on: October 31, 2008, 12:37:07 AM »
I didn't say it definitely would be.  That being said do you think Obama would actually come out and say what you are looking for?  Obama always seems to attack things from the side while disarming the public with his words.  Look at his past attempts to destroy the second amendment.  He claims he supports our traditions while refusing to sign the pro-Heller amicus brief, bribes law reviews to write cover to cover anti-2A journals and funds shame science that gets published in prestigious medical journals.   Oh and he votes to bans cop-killer pistol bullets and by cop killer pistol bullets I mean the ".30-30" the ".223" and the "7.62".  Yup, he sure supports our "traditions".

I know I'm being paranoid and I was being somewhat facetious when I posted this thread.  I just find it curious that he compares this "security force" to the military in so many ways.  His analogies and comparisons are sending up red flags in my mind.  In the end I doubt it will amount to much. Then again I doubted Obama would get this far.  So my ability to predict the future is not to be relied upon.  I generally prepare for the worst but hope for the best.

We know the ammo ban was suggested by Democrats, but you really need to learn to provide citations.

Bogie

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,207
  • Hunkered in South St. Louis, right by Route 66
    • Third Rate Pundit
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #22 on: October 31, 2008, 04:06:32 AM »
Maybe we need them to guard our border to the north...
Blog under construction

wacki

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #23 on: October 31, 2008, 08:01:52 AM »
We know the ammo ban was suggested by Democrats, but you really need to learn to provide citations.
Quote
I thought everyone knew about the .30-30 ban:

read this on the ban:

http://obamagun.blogspot.com/2008/08/ban-rifle-ammunition-commonly-used-for.html

and read this article about law review bribes:

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-attempt-to-destroy-the-second-amendment/

gov of missouri saying obama abuses law enforcement:
http://governor.mo.gov/cgi-bin/coranto/viewnews.cgi?id=EkkkVFulkpOzXqGMaj
Quote
“St. Louis County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch, St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, Jefferson County Sheriff Glenn Boyer, and Obama and the leader of his Missouri campaign Senator Claire McCaskill have attached the stench of police state tactics to the Obama-Biden campaign.

“What Senator Obama and his helpers are doing is scandalous beyond words, the party that claims to be the party of Thomas Jefferson is abusing the justice system and offices of public trust to silence political criticism with threats of prosecution and criminal punishment.

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. 

If you want more let me know.  But Obama is pretty ruthless and these two articles are just the tip of the iceberg.  I honestly thought all of this was common knowledge here.

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,738
Re: The Purpose of Obama's Massive Civilian Army.....
« Reply #24 on: October 31, 2008, 09:12:56 AM »
Okay, I'm just as paranoid as the next guy, but I see nothing in there about compulsory service, nor about brownshirts with armbands coming through neighborhoods making us wear (R)'s on our shirts.  Just about people working off the government dole while the rich get taxed into the Caribbean.
This shits almost as weak as the whole birth certificate flap.
I guess my concern is that he said it was a "security force".  Those two words do not mean Peace Corps or Work Fare.  If that is what he really means then he is a complete idiot who made a huge gaffe.  Comparing it to the military's strength and funding only back that up.  The idea of any sizable military force outside the regular armed forces is troubling to me. 

I agree that this could amount to nothing, but it surprises me that no one in the media seems to want to ask him what he meant. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge