Wow, both Maned and G98 are pissed at me now.
Sheesh.
"Assault" was in quotes to distinguish that the word was of dubious meaning, as we all know. When anti's use that word, they lump in SKS's, AK's, AR's and everything else in there. We all know that.
Nothing wrong with cheap rifles. Cheap rifles make great ways to introduce new shooters to the responsibilities of self defense and the concepts of 2A, militia and government of the People. Many cheap rifles are great rifles.
If I could justify the purchase personally, I would go out and buy an SKS, a Saiga and a host of other rifles. I have nothing against these rifles.
I have no USE for these rifles. I already have 2 fighting rifles that I have no problems with. I should shoot those.
My AR is a far, far, far lower preference rifle to my M14. I do have concerns over the direct impingement system, maned. It got very filthy after an afternoon of about 200 rounds. Disgustingly so. It never failed on me, but I could see that failure as a real possibility within the next hundred rounds or so. I much prefer piston systems. I just went cheap on my AR since it was a backup to the M14, on which I absolutely did NOT go cheap.
I think a more effective means of protest of an anti-gun administration is to deliberately sell guns in private party transactions. Have record attendance at gun shows, with record private party trades or sales. Or, mass invitations of people to the shooting range near you. Invite your office. Invite your church. Invite your next door neighbor. Whatever.
Do something to increase demand for evil rifles beyond increasing the number of safes that current gun nuts have filled. More rifles in more closets, under more beds, in more addresses.
NICS needs to see increased population density for new rifle purchases. I'm sure the ATF has demographic analysis of all SSN's or persons phoned in and total number of NICS clearances.
If the volume of calls goes up or remains the same, but the demographics spread so that the average guns per household DROPS (due to new households with a first gun), then that information will get to the Democratic Leadership. They will see gun ownership gaining traction and popularity. They will leave it alone.
If guns per capita spikes here, though, we'll have a problem because we'll be seen as a narrow demographic. We're hoarding, or stockpiling, or preparing for insurrection, or something stupid like that.
Buy what you like. Shoot it lots.
But don't clean out your local store, and if it's the last gun on the rack and you're fine for guns, consider leaving it for someone else to buy who might really draw more political or real world benefit from it than you might.
At least that's my opinion, long winded and such as it might be.
And on that note, I bid you all a good night.