Author Topic: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship  (Read 6148 times)

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Wasn't the old saying, "Lions led by asses?"

I guess nowadays it may be more accurate to write, "21st century warriors armed with the best 20th century Cold War leftovers."

Do mash the link for lots of links to source materials.




http://www.michaelyon-online.com/red-flag.htm

A missive arrived to me from a well-placed British officer.  I know this officer well, and respect his abilities.  He has been to both Iraq and Afghanistan.  In part, the missive said:

Quote

    “Please have a look at the attached from the UK Times.  Regarding the Rachel Sylvester piece, we have not been able to find any such document/memo although it is possible that an e-mail exists somewhere that refers to such a matter – more likely to be a warning not to dick about regarding what extra troops the UK might be able to find for AFG and raise unrealistic US expectations.”

    Rachel Sylvester US doubts about UK military effectiveness 6 Jan 09.pdf
    The Special Relationship Times leader 7 Jan 09.pdf

The words imply that the US-UK relationship is fraying.  This is untrue as seen from the foxholes I am constantly in.  I have embedded with numerous British units in Iraq and Afghanistan, and have seen combat with all of those units.  Maybe five or so.  The units included 2 Rifles, 4 Rifles, Queen's Royal Lancers, Duke of Lancaster's, 2 Para, and I believe perhaps a couple more though there was much going on and it’s difficult to remember.
 
What I can say, is that the significant combat I saw with British soldiers made me respect them more with each battle.  Yes, it’s true their gear needs serious upgrading.  The British government needs to spend billions to upgrade the hardware.  But when it comes to the soldier, British soldiers are extremely well-trained, courageous and ready for a big firefight at the drop of a hat.  Our brothers and sisters are vastly outnumbered at Helmand Province in Afghanistan.  I think about them several times a day and am concerned that they might take serious losses this year.
 
When the question comes up about what Americans think about our closest ally, I ask MANY American soldiers what they think of the British.  There are mixed opinions of course, but the bottom line is that American combat veterans greatly respect British soldiers.  The British just need better gear.  Another well-placed British Army officer recently told me while I was in Afghanistan that the British have plenty of helicopters.  I did not respect those words, though I was told by an important American officer that this British officer is very good.  “Don’t bullshit me, sir,” I replied only in my head.  “I Don’t like BS.”  The British need more helicopters. The American and British soldiers know this.  A problem with the British soldiers is similar to a problem with our own Marines.  They refuse to complain, so they get leftovers. A retired Australian officer of great significance asked me what I thought of British soldiers.  I said something to the effect of, “My opinion is suspect because I greatly respect British soldiers…”   If I did not respect British soldiers, I would not keep going into combat with them.
 
I have common access to the basement and stratosphere of our military.  Nobody wants to see the British go.  Strangely, both the British and American officers give high praise to the French.  The French actually will fight like mad dogs, they say.

It’s always easy to find a British or American soldier who will make a passing derogatory remark about someone.  If a reporter is shopping for a fight, those are easy to generate.  Yes, it’s easy to find Brits who say bad things about Americans, but definitely harder to find Americans who will say something bad about Brits.  We have some kind of strange reflex that prevents us from talking bad about Brits.  Our soldiers respect the Brits and do not talk bad about them.  But it’s easy to find British soldiers who complain about other British units, and Americans who complain about other American units.  U.S. Marines complain about U.S. Army; Army complains about Marines.  This battalion complains about that battalion.  Soldiers complain.  My ears overflow with vacuous complaints and also with real ones.  There is no real complaint against the British other than they need to field their military with better gear.  The British fight very well, but they need better gear.
 
This message was sent to me from a British officer:

Quote
    "I know that, in the past, us Brits have rather banged on about our COIN experience and there is a natural (and not necessarily unhelpful) rivalry between US and UK forces that has existed for 70 odd years.  But there is deep respect for the US military in the British Army, but particularly the US Army and USMC with which we have more contact, especially the doctrinal transformation over the past few years.  This goes from the lowest level, for example the Scottish infantry soldiers working with the MEU in Garmsir in 2008, to the highest levels of our command. 
     
    Let me give you just one example.  In July 2006 a Danish soldier working under UK command in Helmand was grievously wounded in a rather beleaguered (it was under repeated direct and indirect fire) outpost in Helmand – if I remember correctly it was Musa Qaleh.  The compound was too small for a Chinook to land to get the casualty out and the UK's small helicopters could not fly in the day time because of the extreme heat and altitude.  The soldier was dying and he couldn't wait. A battle-group level hasty air assault operation was planned to secure a landing zone nearby in Taleban dominated area and the intent was for the small garrison to fight its way out to get the casualty to that landing zone.  There was no doubt, not only must we expect to take further casualties, we could lose a Chinook. Then, a US Blackhawk medical helicopter swept in and then out of the compound with the casualty who I know was still alive when he later made it home to Denmark.  The whole attitude, despite the acute risk involved, was one of "no problem, anytime, just ask", as we say, "normal jogging".  Yet, no one who knew of that single event would have had anything other than the greatest admiration for those involved and the organization to which they belonged."

Our relationship with Great Britain is more than merely healthy.  It’s very strong.  The British are very close family.  We are in a serious fight in Afghanistan.  This is a team, and some members play harder than others.  The British are ready and willing to throw hard shots.  The British know the price of fighting.  And they know that the price for not fighting can be much higher. 
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

Cromlech

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,402
  • English bloke
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2009, 11:04:30 AM »
Sounds about right to me. Every year our Armed Forces seem to lose a submarine here, a base there, another ship down here. This is what really bothers me about the guys making all of these cuts, they expect our guys to fight in the harshest conditions, yet don't want to fork out the £££ for kit to let them do as good a job as their training allows.
We have a small military as it is, with something like just 100,000 Regular Soldiers in the Army.
When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt, run in little circles, wave your arms and shout!

agricola

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,248
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2009, 11:10:50 AM »
Sounds about right to me. Every year our Armed Forces seem to lose a submarine here, a base there, another ship down here. This is what really bothers me about the guys making all of these cuts, they expect our guys to fight in the harshest conditions, yet don't want to fork out the £££ for kit to let them do as good a job as their training allows.
We have a small military as it is, with something like just 100,000 Regular Soldiers in the Army.

Indeed.  If anything I would say that the most fractious relationship right now is between senior officers of the Armed Forces and the politicians who have engaged them in various military campaigns without providing the proper kit and repeatedly lying, to the public, Parliament and the Army itself, about resolving this. 
"Idiot!  A long life eating mush is best."
"Make peace, you fools"

grampster

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9,449
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2009, 11:23:47 AM »
Personally I have only the highest regard for our British cousins.  Some of my roots are in England, Scotland and Ireland as well as Germany and Lithuania.

America is a much better nation because of our British roots.
"Never wrestle with a pig.  You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."  G.B. Shaw

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2009, 03:59:52 PM »
Quote
I have common access to the basement and stratosphere of our military.  Nobody wants to see the British go.  Strangely, both the British and American officers give high praise to the French.  The French actually will fight like mad dogs, they say.

It's the French leadership and command that suck. The actual soldiers have always been vicious fighters. Read some about the stuff they did in scuffles in Africa in the 70's and 80's, even. Tough guys with a MAS 49/56 (.308, basically) as their issue weapon, some cigarettes and some vin ordinaire, fighting against savage people in horrible places.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,418
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2009, 12:15:25 PM »
I am told that promotion in the very lowest enlisted ranks of the British Army (similar to the American E1-E4) is slower and more difficult than in the U.S. Army.  The result is a higher degree of professionalism and competence in that group, than among American privates and specialists. 

Can anyone confirm? 
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

El Tejon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,641
    • http://www.kirkfreemanlaw.com
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2009, 03:39:53 PM »
Yes, the "lifer private" is not unknown.
I do not smoke pot, wear Wookie suits, live in my mom's basement, collect unemployment checks or eat Cheetoes, therefore I am not a Ron Paul voter.

Bogie

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,212
  • Hunkered in South St. Louis, right by Route 66
    • Third Rate Pundit
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2009, 04:22:30 PM »
But I thought that they were equipped with real battle rifles, which are worth 10 mouseguns any day?
Blog under construction

Regolith

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,171
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2009, 04:26:57 PM »
But I thought that they were equipped with real battle rifles, which are worth 10 mouseguns any day?

Nope.  They're equipped with the L85A2, which is chambered in 5.56 NATO.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. - Thomas Jefferson

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. - William Pitt the Younger

Perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything. - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2009, 04:28:16 PM »
But I thought that they were equipped with real battle rifles, which are worth 10 mouseguns any day?

They turned in their L1A1's for the execrable SA-80 in the 1980's, I think.

Cromlech

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,402
  • English bloke
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2009, 04:31:16 PM »

It's an ugly bugger, and is heavy for a 5.56mm rifle, but it is accurate. I have used the the Cadet L98A1 version, and the bigger L86A1 (Light Support Weapon), in the cadets.
The L1A1 SLR was probably a bit awkward clearing houses with in Northern Ireland.
When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt, run in little circles, wave your arms and shout!

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2009, 04:33:44 PM »
The L1A1 SLR was probably a bit awkward clearing houses with in Northern Ireland.

Yes, but there was room to develop the design into something like DSA's SA-58 commando that they're selling like hotcakes now.

But I know, that was the time everyone was going to small-caliber rifles. Which is good for in-house fighting, but in the Khyber Pass, maybe not so much?

Something of a shame the UK seems to have destroyed them all, instead of doing something like we're doing with the M-14's. Refit, and one per squad for a bit more gun when it's needed.

Could have taken all those L1A1s and done something like this, perhaps?

« Last Edit: January 11, 2009, 04:42:02 PM by Manedwolf »

Cromlech

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,402
  • English bloke
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2009, 04:41:06 PM »
Yeah, that sounds about right. If we had a whole load of SLRs left over we could just issue them to the boys in Afghanistan, but knowing the head honchos, they probably melted them down and made themselves medals from them. :D


That is the LSW I used as an older Cadet. Very nice on the range, and certainly more suited to a 15 year old than the GPMG, but it did seem a bit naff.

There is the Cadet GP rifle, a single shot SA80.

3.82 kg (8.4 lb) (L85A1 empty)
4.98 kg (11.0 lb) (L85A1 with SUSAT sight)
6.58 kg (14.5 lb) (L86A1 LSW)

As you can see, they aren't exactly light once you put the SUSAT on (standard optics).
When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt, run in little circles, wave your arms and shout!

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2009, 04:45:16 PM »
Yeah, that sounds about right. If we had a whole load of SLRs left over we could just issue them to the boys in Afghanistan, but knowing the head honchos, they probably melted them down and made themselves medals from them. :D

I think a lot of them ended up over here in the form of parts kits to be put on horrible cast receivers by Century, impugning the reputation of a previously excellent rifle.

Gewehr98

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,010
  • Yee-haa!
    • Neural Misfires (Blog)
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2009, 04:49:27 PM »
Actually, I know of at least one L1A1 kit that got a nice Imbel receiver...
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...

http://neuralmisfires.blogspot.com

"Never squat with your spurs on!"

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2009, 04:55:14 PM »
Actually, I know of at least one L1A1 kit that got a nice Imbel receiver...

Oh, some did, definitely. I just feel bad about the ones that got stuck on Century ones, or worse, Century-assembled Hesse. They did crank out a lot of the "L1A1 Sporter" with the infamous unibrow feed ramp. Imbel = good.

El Tejon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,641
    • http://www.kirkfreemanlaw.com
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2009, 05:02:38 PM »
Quote
If we had a whole load of SLRs left over we could just issue them to the boys in Afghanistan, but knowing the head honchos, they probably melted them down and made themselves medals from them.

I thought MoD tossed your Mechanical Muskets in the steel furnaces of West Midlands?

Pity you should have sold them like the Aussies.  I snagged one of their FALs.  I'd sell it back, if you needed it. =D
I do not smoke pot, wear Wookie suits, live in my mom's basement, collect unemployment checks or eat Cheetoes, therefore I am not a Ron Paul voter.

Cromlech

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,402
  • English bloke
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2009, 05:06:25 PM »
I wonder what the ladies and gents in customs would make of that.  :angel:
When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt, run in little circles, wave your arms and shout!

Viking

  • ❤︎ Fuck around & find out ❤︎
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,207
  • Carnist Bloodmouth
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #18 on: January 11, 2009, 05:12:01 PM »
I wonder what the ladies and gents in customs would make of that.  :angel:
Just hope they don't know crap about guns, and tell them it's deactivated? :angel:
“The modern world will not be punished. It is the punishment.” — Nicolás Gómez Dávila

El Tejon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,641
    • http://www.kirkfreemanlaw.com
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #19 on: January 11, 2009, 05:13:53 PM »
Quote
I wonder what the ladies and gents in customs would make of that

Just like in the States when I order guns from overseas on a Form 6.  The mouth-breathing bureaucrats would check the form and send it off to MoD, but only after you pay me for your rifle(in Euros please). =D
I do not smoke pot, wear Wookie suits, live in my mom's basement, collect unemployment checks or eat Cheetoes, therefore I am not a Ron Paul voter.

Bogie

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,212
  • Hunkered in South St. Louis, right by Route 66
    • Third Rate Pundit
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #20 on: January 11, 2009, 05:35:43 PM »
Those things look like they'd suck if you fired 'em from prone...
Blog under construction

RevDisk

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,633
    • RevDisk.net
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #21 on: January 11, 2009, 05:40:01 PM »
It's an ugly bugger, and is heavy for a 5.56mm rifle, but it is accurate. I have used the the Cadet L98A1 version, and the bigger L86A1 (Light Support Weapon), in the cadets.
The L1A1 SLR was probably a bit awkward clearing houses with in Northern Ireland.

Sir, your country has the honour of having the worst service rifle commonly fielded today.   

I'm sorry, I really did try to love it.  I tried.  But it sucks.  Horribly.  Previous to firing it, I had two mental categories.  Roughly Equal to M16 (which is a lot of rifles) and Far Better than M16.  Your service rifle is the only one I can say is hands down significantly worse.  It's heavy for its size, it's a bullpup, the mag changes are bad even for a bullpup design, the sights aren't great, the ergonomics are 'ok' at best, it recoils funny, it's very bloody loud, and the accuracy isn't good compared to a properly maintained M16A2. 

I'm biased against bullpups, but please...  Bullpups can be "good enough" with some common sense.  The AUG isn't that bad, for instance.
"Rev, your picture is in my King James Bible, where Paul talks about "inventors of evil."  Yes, I know you'll take that as a compliment."  - Fistful, possibly highest compliment I've ever received.

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #22 on: January 11, 2009, 11:08:23 PM »

It's an ugly bugger, and is heavy for a 5.56mm rifle, but it is accurate. I have used the the Cadet L98A1 version, and the bigger L86A1 (Light Support Weapon), in the cadets.
The L1A1 SLR was probably a bit awkward clearing houses with in Northern Ireland.

OK, where TF is the bayonet lug?  Some folks discount the bayo, but I consider it of use.  And I don't see one on the Brit rifle.

If it sucks *expletive deleted*ss as a rifle, can it at least be used as a pig sticker, somehow?
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

Manedwolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,516
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #23 on: January 11, 2009, 11:12:31 PM »
The British rifle looks like what might happen if North Korea tried to make an AUG copy with ancient Soviet-era shops that could only cut sheet steel at right angles.

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,002
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Brit Combat Units Well Manned, Poorly Equipped & US/UK Relationship
« Reply #24 on: January 12, 2009, 12:30:08 AM »
I thought that the remanufactured L85A2 models had a much better reputation than the original SA-80s. 
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.