These guys are too much.
Why would the US have been reducing it's military presence in UK and Europe if it intended to invade?
That was before the US lost the war in Iraq. (I must have missed that one-when did we "lose"?)
Why would the US invade the UK when it is dependent on UK investors buying US bonds to keeps it's economy afloat?
To keep the US dollar from sinking? The US economy is going down the drain. (That's why the Euro just tanked against the US dollar, and US unemployment hit a four-year low in January, and 262,000 new jobs were added in February.)
After the why is the how. How would the US, who military is clearly overstretched now, launch an amphibious assualt against an industrial nuclear power across the Atlantic Ocean?
The UK has been reducing its military year on year for some time, and the US is still militarily the world superpower - now, unfortunately, being directed by an insane elite cadre. I don't think that the British public is ready to fire a nuclear missile at any country, just now - unlike the American "nuke 'em all" lobby ranting all over the web, British people are better educated overall and keener on helping other countries towards a better future of their own devising. (unlike America, who invaded Iraq just for fun, or for the oil, or something.)
Anyway, it would not be amphibious. The US military would create a temporary landing strip on a remote part of the UK coastline and fly in its invading troops. (Right--we'd invade the UK with paratroopers in some remote coastal site. Good thinking.)
It's good to see that the DU doesn't have a complete monopoly on idiots.
