Author Topic: The Founders and the property requirement for voting  (Read 13487 times)

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: The Founders and the property requirement for voting
« Reply #75 on: November 03, 2010, 12:46:38 AM »
New Jersey? Also, where's the Sweden reference?

I was thinking Massachusets.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,397
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: The Founders and the property requirement for voting
« Reply #76 on: November 03, 2010, 01:09:03 AM »
Personally, I would rather just do away with parties. Completely. Just think, if we didn't have parties we wouldn't have to worry about RINOs (or DINOs, if you swing that way), we wouldn't have to worry about primaries, we wouldn't have to worry about caucuses ... we could just, like, vote for the person we think would best represent us.

Socrates: Nothing prevents you from voting for anyone you want. Why don't you just do that?
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife