As a part of my magistrate position, I hear complaints seeking to remove children from abusive/neglectful/dangerous homes. In Ohio, Child Protective Services goes through the county prosecutor, a complaint is filed, and the matter tried to the juvenile court (bench, no jury).
Last week, I'm heaaring one of the cases. Prosecutor ain't doing so hot proving the case to me. All of the sudden, out of nowhere, this happened:
Pros: "Do you have any weapons in your home?"
Dad: "Yes."
Pros: "And, do you have any assault weapons?"
Dad: "No."
Pros: "But you have automic weapons, true?"
Dad: "No. Semi-auto, but not auto."
Pros: "So, assault weapons."
Dad: "No, a semi-auto rifle and shotgun."
Pros: "And you carry a weapon?"
Dad: "I have a permit."
Pros: "wouldn't you agree that it's dangerous for children to be in the same home where you have assault weapons and carry a gun?"
Dad: "No, I think that makes them safer."
After throwing out the State's case, I asked the Dad's lawyer why she didn't object to the weapon questions. She smirked and pointed to my desk. A copy of American Rifleman was sitting on top of my mail. Guess she wins the prize for paying attention to her surroundings. She then said "takes on to know one" and showed me a copy of Hundgun magazine in her briefcase.