Author Topic: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine  (Read 1118 times)

TechMan

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,562
  • Yes, your moderation has been outsourced.
Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« on: June 08, 2012, 04:06:16 PM »
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/06/us/submarine-fire/index.html?

USS Miami was docked for repairs and a fire started (on board) in a vacuum cleaner used to clean work sites at the end of a shift.  The fire caused an estimated $400 million in damage.  I would say that is a might big Ooops.
Quote
Hawkmoon - Never underestimate another person's capacity for stupidity. Any time you think someone can't possibly be that dumb ... they'll prove you wrong.

Bacon and Eggs - A day's work for a chicken; A lifetime commitment for a pig.
Stupidity will always be its own reward.
Bad decisions make good stories.

Quote
Viking - The problem with the modern world is that there aren't really any predators eating stupid people.

zxcvbob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,235
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2012, 04:10:48 PM »
Not as bad as losing the whole boat because you flushed a toilet while submerged (German U-1206)   :facepalm:
"It's good, though..."

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2012, 05:35:35 PM »
Well that sucks.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2012, 08:32:58 PM »
wow, 400 mil............ MY MONEY!!! (somebody had to say it)
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2012, 10:55:04 PM »
wow, 400 mil............ MY MONEY!!! (somebody had to say it)

Of course you realize that $400M is just an estimate and that the actual cost will probably be closer to twice that much.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

Azrael256

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,083
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2012, 12:12:10 AM »
 :facepalm:

I know some submariner is going to come along and lecture about how not barbecuing a sub is harder than it looks, but...


Does The Navy realize just how dumb they look when they total a billion-dollar boat because somebody forgot to empty the bag?

Sinking a boat because of a defective crapper is almost acceptable when you're talking about a device that's only marginally less complex than a car engine.  Turning a nuclear sub into razor blades because the maid couldn't figure out what to do when the Hoover got all sparky is just embarassing.

BobR

  • Just a pup compared to a few old dogs here!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,279
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2012, 02:58:48 AM »
:facepalm:

I know some submariner is going to come along and lecture about how not barbecuing a sub is harder than it looks, but...


Does The Navy realize just how dumb they look when they total a billion-dollar boat because somebody forgot to empty the bag?

Sinking a boat because of a defective crapper is almost acceptable when you're talking about a device that's only marginally less complex than a car engine.  Turning a nuclear sub into razor blades because the maid couldn't figure out what to do when the Hoover got all sparky is just embarassing.

Actually it was the shipyard workers that forgot to empty the vacuum cleaner after using it to suck up welding slag. Every submariner I know ( a few) has stated there is no way they would submerge on this boat now. There were places where the hull was glowing red from the chimney effect fire.

Not a good thing, at all.

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2012/06/navy-miami-sub-fire-vacuum-cleaner-060612w/

bob


erictank

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,410
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2012, 05:34:34 AM »
Actually it was the shipyard workers that forgot to empty the vacuum cleaner after using it to suck up welding slag. Every submariner I know ( a few) has stated there is no way they would submerge on this boat now. There were places where the hull was glowing red from the chimney effect fire.

Not a good thing, at all.

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2012/06/navy-miami-sub-fire-vacuum-cleaner-060612w/

bob



Yeah, that sounds like razor blade-time to me. No WAY that hull's gonna be safe for submergence now.  And I wasn't even a sub guy (carrier for me).

geronimotwo

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,796
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2012, 08:42:30 AM »
a blacksmith would have used just the right amount of water (while fighting the fire) to retemper the hull.
make the world idiot proof.....and you will have a world full of idiots. -g2

TommyGunn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,956
  • Stuck in full auto since birth.
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2012, 11:39:17 AM »
Not as bad as losing the whole boat because you flushed a toilet while submerged (German U-1206)   :facepalm:
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

I recall reading that toilets on some of those old U-boots were operated by a series of levers ..... which, if operated incorrectly, would flood the boat rather than flush the toilet.  Not good getting that effluent squirted right back at ya!  :facepalm: [barf]

My father served on an old Gato-class diesel electric from 1953-4, which had been reclassified as a "hunter-killer."  I recall being able to, circa the early mid 1960s being able to take an unofficial "tour" of the boat (the U.S.S. Cavalla, which is now part of a museum exhibit in Pelican Bay, Tx) and the "toilet" was a recess in a corridor....with a plastic bathroom curtain across it; either your knees or your bum were likely to project into the corridor, depending upon what you were doing .......  =D :O
Ain't no privacy in them ol' sardine cans...................... >:D
MOLON LABE   "Through ignorance of what is good and what is bad, the life of men is greatly perplexed." ~~ Cicero

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: Vacuum cleaner blamed for fire on nuclear submarine
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2012, 01:38:32 PM »
Likely if saving the boat is the best choice they can replace a section of the hull.
Another alternative is simply restrict the operating depth of the boat.

---------

The heads on the  boats I was on flushed to a holding tank(sanitary tank). The sanitary tank is emptied by pressurizing it with air and blowing it to sea, then the pressure is vented inboard through activated charcoal filters which sort of absorb the odor. The head facilities are isolated from air  pressure by 2 valves. Sometimes the valve in the tank leaks by a little and if the flush ball valve gets opened a poop geyser is the probable result. Much hilarity ensues when it happens.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams