Author Topic: No Gun Control News Today (Read 6842 times)

seeker_two · « **Reply #25 on:** January 24, 2013, 07:50:10 AM »

Steve: In that case, would you have some legal protection if you immediately reported the incident to the police and provided the 4473 and other relavant data to them?

RoadKingLarry · « **Reply #26 on:** January 24, 2013, 08:07:56 AM »

Sounds like they are gonna double down and lay their gun control cards on the table today.

SteveS · « **Reply #27 on:** January 24, 2013, 08:51:39 AM »

Quote from: seeker_two on January 24, 2013, 07:50:10 AM

Steve: In that case, would you have some legal protection if you immediately reported the incident to the police and provided the 4473 and other relavant data to them?

It would probably help, though it may still be an issue. I haven't had to deal with a delay. All of my buyers have either been approved or had a CPL, thus getting rid of the need for NICS approval.

Fjolnirsson · « **Reply #28 on:** January 24, 2013, 05:47:57 PM »

I've been at work, any news today?

Nick1911 · « **Reply #29 on:** January 24, 2013, 05:54:51 PM »

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/278993-report-feinstein-to-introduce-assault-weapons-ban-thursday

It's still shaky on the details.

150 models explicitly called out. Existing hardware is grandfathered in, but will be added to a registry. [Hmm, wonder what that will be used for in the future?]

red headed stranger · « **Reply #30 on:** January 24, 2013, 05:56:27 PM »

I love how she padded her list with already banned firearms so she could get to 150.

erictank · « **Reply #31 on:** January 24, 2013, 06:30:43 PM »

Quote from: AJ Dual on January 23, 2013, 10:51:35 AM

Most people find that FFL's refuse to transfer even if the three-days has passed. They're too fearful of bad press, or getting the stink-eye from the ATF or local LEA's even if/when they followed the law to the letter, should a gun sold after three days turn up in a crime. Or they risk things like punitive audits etc. in the future, or from the local municipal government on things like zoning or building inspections, occupancy permits etc.

Sterling Arsenal in Sterling VA has a policy like this - regardless of the fact that the law states outright that the sale can proceed after 3 days if there's no answer, they WILL NOT (according to their site) transfer without a NICS approval. Period.

Which is a shame, because they've otherwise been pretty good to me, customer-service-wise.

cassandra and sara's daddy · « **Reply #32 on:** January 24, 2013, 06:45:24 PM »

Quote from: Hawkmoon on January 23, 2013, 06:24:21 PM

How can they withdraw an approval on a zoning matter? I know laws differ from state to state, but I served as chair of my town's planning and zoning commission a number of years ago. Once we issued a determination that a proposed application met the regulations, there was nothing we could withdraw. The only way we could un-approve something would be if the nature of the business changed significantly -- enough to put it outside of what the regulations allowed.

special use permit?

we had a real hoot of a case(s) in prince william county involving a dump expansion and eminent domain. county got thweir butt handed to them several times by an old hill billy. with good lawyers

Ben · « **Reply #33 on:** January 24, 2013, 06:57:35 PM »

Quote from: Nick1911 on January 24, 2013, 05:54:51 PM

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/278993-report-feinstein-to-introduce-assault-weapons-ban-thursday

It's still shaky on the details.

150 models explicitly called out. Existing hardware is grandfathered in, but will be added to a registry. [Hmm, wonder what that will be used for in the future?]

Apparently Carolyn McCarthy's comments to the bill were, "if guns aren't in stores, they can't be bought". Sort of like pot, meth, moonshine, rhino horns, Romulan Ale, roadside pie stands, Girl Scout cookies, and Alliance foodstuffs.

red headed stranger · « **Reply #34 on:** January 24, 2013, 07:22:47 PM »

Feinstein isn't even pretending. She said that the purpose of this bill is to "dry up the supply of these weapons over time."

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #35 on:** January 24, 2013, 07:49:23 PM »

Quote from: red headed stranger on January 24, 2013, 07:22:47 PM

Feinstein isn't even pretending. She said that the purpose of this bill is to "dry up the supply of these weapons over time."

Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #36 on:** January 24, 2013, 07:55:33 PM »

http://washingtonexaminer.com/sen.-diane-feinstein-opens-up-anti-gun-presser-with-a-prayer/article/2519581#.UQHXbzltjcu

Quote

I believe that the gun lobby is no match for the cross lobby.

Mixing religion and politics is sinister and wicked. Until the left wants to do it.

(And for those of you not paying attention, the left does it with some regularity.)

Tallpine · « **Reply #37 on:** January 24, 2013, 08:07:39 PM »

Quote from: fistful on January 24, 2013, 07:49:23 PM

Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in.

Ammo first

Hutch · « **Reply #38 on:** January 25, 2013, 08:41:43 AM »

Mini-14 tactical - banned.
Mini-14 Ranch Rifle - not on the list.
Hi-Point carbine (10 round mag) - banned
Beretta Storm carbine - banned
Beretta 92, that uses the same bleeping magazines!!! - not on the list
Kel-Tec Sub 2000 - banned
Sig, Glock, S&W pistols that use the same magazines as the Kel-Tec - not on the list

I swear to Shiva, does anyone there have a frackin' CLUE?

SteveS · « **Reply #39 on:** January 25, 2013, 09:04:54 AM »

Quote from: Hutch on January 25, 2013, 08:41:43 AM

Mini-14 tactical - banned.
Mini-14 Ranch Rifle - not on the list.
Hi-Point carbine (10 round mag) - banned
Beretta Storm carbine - banned
Beretta 92, that uses the same bleeping magazines!!! - not on the list
Kel-Tec Sub 2000 - banned
Sig, Glock, S&W pistols that use the same magazines as the Kel-Tec - not on the list

I swear to Shiva, does anyone there have a frackin' CLUE?

Sure. Ban the scary stuff first. The other stuff will soon follow.

Monkeyleg · « **Reply #40 on:** January 25, 2013, 11:53:29 AM »

How exactly does Feinstein intend to "dry up the supply of weapons over time" when there are somewhere between 250 million to as many as 500 million of them in the US, and they can last centuries if properly cared for?

AZRedhawk44 · « **Reply #41 on:** January 25, 2013, 12:09:32 PM »

Quote from: Monkeyleg on January 25, 2013, 11:53:29 AM

How exactly does Feinstein intend to "dry up the supply of weapons over time" when there are somewhere between 250 million to as many as 500 million of them in the US, and they can last centuries if properly cared for?

They'll last far longer than the Republic, that's for sure.

We're at 2013, and the Constitution was ratified in 1789. That's 224 years. Most governments only have a lifespan of 200-250 years.

I don't expect us to have a tricentennial.

longeyes · « **Reply #42 on:** January 25, 2013, 12:55:23 PM »

Since when do people who dodge bullets, or don't dodge them, become experts on firearms?

Blakenzy · « **Reply #43 on:** January 25, 2013, 02:04:05 PM »

Feinstein is unredeemable as a human being.

Seriously, isn't conspiring against people's Rights recognized by current Law as an illegal activity? I find it odd that no one has called her out on that. She doesn't want to regulate, she wants to terminate.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #44 on:** January 25, 2013, 11:39:55 PM »

Quote from: Blakenzy on January 25, 2013, 02:04:05 PM

Feinstein is unredeemable as a human being.

Seriously, isn't conspiring against people's Rights recognized by current Law as an illegal activity? I find it odd that no one has called her out on that. She doesn't want to regulate, she wants to terminate.

Well, she's a Democrat, right? Pro-abortion? Anti-gun? Yeah, there's an entire political party devoted to terminating AND regulating, so let's call them all out.

Ron · « **Reply #45 on:** January 26, 2013, 01:22:30 AM »

Truth is whatever is expedient.

Hutch · « **Reply #46 on:** January 26, 2013, 02:46:18 PM »

Aaaaaaand the lead story is the march on Washington for greater gun control. At least the news is calling it that instead of "gun safety" or "gun violence". I wish Mother Gaia would swallow them up.

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #47 on:** January 26, 2013, 03:35:27 PM »

The pro-lifers march on Washington every year, at about this time. Wonder how much coverage they got.

What do you all make of this?

http://thehill.com/blogs/regwatch/pending-regs/279345-holder-begins-gun-control-push

Ben · « **Reply #48 on:** January 26, 2013, 09:00:40 PM »

Quote from: Hutch on January 26, 2013, 02:46:18 PM

Aaaaaaand the lead story is the march on Washington for greater gun control. At least the news is calling it that instead of "gun safety" or "gun violence". I wish Mother Gaia would swallow them up.

Pro gun people were there too. Gotta love this guy's sign:

News:

Author Topic: No Gun Control News Today (Read 6842 times)