It should kill the debate, but don't count on it. We had the same sort of factual presentations in 1994, but they didn't sway the other side one bit.
Face it: there are many supporters of the 1994 and current AWB who were in the military, and know full well the difference between full-auto and semi, who know what barrel shrouds are, and what collapsible or folding stocks do. This is not about reducing the number of super-lethal guns, as if there even were such a thing. This is about advancing an agenda, one with the ultimate goal of a disarmed society.