R.I.P. Scout26
Because a sword is scarier than a Bradley. And easy to use well with minimal recent training. And isn't bulky and likely to catch on everything. And Soldiers aren't already carrying a ton of way more useful crap. And fighting goes hand to hand so often. And Soldiers have nothing better to do before a deployment than learn how to swing a sword they'll never use.(Pardon the snark. Being up until 03:00 doing homework disagrees with me.)
I'm actually seriously considering a short sword for my next LCU deployment. Reports from other LCU's in the gulf are that the Iranian's are getting wierd, and the occifers have taken to locking up the ammo.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.
There's a guy who sells custom short-swords for members of the armed forces.
http://www.gagecustomknives.com/Tactical%20swords.htmHe's sold a few to members of the armed forces. I can't say he makes swords "for the military" as such.
Why does he use a hollow grind? Seems to me that's a really poor edge for a sword. It's great for razors and hunting knives because it makes a thin, sharp cutting edge, but for applications where it's going to be used hard it's not very well supported and is prone to turning. A saber or convex grind would be a lot better.
Hollow is easy to produce. Pull the stock between two wheels, that's why it's so common on production pocket knives.Flat grind and convex take more hand work.