So, does this mean I shouldn't buy a Glock 20?
The guns a person has in there collection means nothing more then that's what they like/want.
Who knows why they Lanza's had a Glock 20.
Does it really *expletive deleted*ing matter?
The question of "who should have what and why" is not a question WE should ask, bother to discuss or even entertain. It is a question of the anti gun movement which they want answered at our expence.
As for tinfoiling this event, Really? That's what we decend too?
Yes, we know that the anti's jump on these tragic events and politise them to the maximum, but to sit and *whine* about it being a government setup is wasting time.
In all (sad) honesty, the government doesn't need to manufacture such events. They happen in the natural course of events, and esculate in times of civil unease.
I'm more concerned with the media continuing to hype what I consider to be a mediocore collection of firearm related stuff as a sign of insainity.