I didn't badger you. I didn't say you were a heretic. I didn't say your Catholic Bible is wrong. I'm discussing the issues with you. How is that bad?
We have hundreds (or thousands) of sects and denominations in the present day. Some of whom are more doctrinally correct than others. Some of whom are so far off-track that they can't (logically) be considered followers of the same Christ that everyone else is claiming to follow. This was also true way back then.
Using the term "gospel" is not wrong in the way I use it. I did not refer to other gospels as the canonicals, I just said that their were other gospels.
From
Wikipedia:
A gospel is an account describing the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. The most widely known examples are the four canonical gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, but the term is also used to refer to apocryphal gospels, non-canonical gospels, Jewish-Christian gospels, and gnostic gospels.
I mentioned the hundred of different Christian churches that were in existence shortly after the death of Christ, because it was hundreds of different versions of worshiping Christianity. Somewhere in the 300's the bible as we know it was becoming assembled and it took another 900 or so years after that where it was canonized as we get it today.
What exactly is doctrinally correct and what it not? Has anyone alive communed with Apostles or Christ and her them say, well this is actually the correct way, or you know your doing it all wrong. I also get frustrated with many organized Christian churches because Christ told us not to judge, but it was reserved for God to judge, but there are lot of Christians and sects of Christianity that are pretty judgmental of other people, even quite vocal that they are not going to heaven because of their behaviors. Passage from KJV Matthew 7:1–5.
