Author Topic: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco  (Read 4760 times)

mtnbkr

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15,388
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #25 on: April 07, 2014, 08:02:25 PM »
We're just joking here, right?

If you say so.  Hard to tell sometime.  I'm sure the vandals were just joking too. :)

Chris

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #26 on: April 07, 2014, 08:08:26 PM »
Having seen too many (one was way too many but for some reason I got to see even more) front end/front quarter crashes, I want something that will absotively guarantee that there will be as much front leg room after as there was just before the crash.

And no, air bags/seat belts are not rated as "safe" at typical highway speeds.  But they do reduce the chance that you will be speared by the steering column.  Not always sure that is a good thing.

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45,996
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #27 on: April 07, 2014, 09:00:05 PM »
We're just joking here, right?

Well, we were.

"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

BlueStarLizzard

  • Queen of the Cislords
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 15,039
  • Oh please, nobody died last time...
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #28 on: April 07, 2014, 09:01:01 PM »
I was thinking the funny more along the lines of people with a superority complex find themselves harrassed by vandles.

I wouldn't say the vandles are innocent little prankster or doing good things at all.
I would say they probably wouldn't be out tipping my car (which also has good gas milage and is fairly compact for parking in tight spots) and I laugh at the special people and their SMART car, when, once again, it prooves to be less then Smart.
"Okay, um, I'm lost. Uh, I'm angry, and I'm armed, so if you two have something that you need to work out --" -Malcolm Reynolds

Firethorn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,789
  • Where'd my explosive space modulator go?
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #29 on: April 07, 2014, 10:00:21 PM »
Top Gear did just that:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iKGfo1wmOM


I think I'd prefer if Mythbusters, or somebody else for that matter, did it with a proper crash test dummy.  For example, apparently the Smart Car was the only one to still pass the offset barrier even when they weighted it up to a mid-sized car.

For example, I'm seeing figures for > 100 g and 214g for survival in crashes.  > 25 G for 'death or serious injury likely', but 46.2g for rocket sled deceleration tests which didn't have fancy pre-tensioning seatbelts with careful amounts of slack.  Of course you also subtract points for not having a 5 point harness, but add points for airbags.

Still, let's do some figuring:
70 mph = 31.3 m/s, 1 G = 9.81 m/s^2

I'm not seeing the crush depth of the smart, other than it's 'not a lot', so I'm looking for crush depth necessary.
25G(death or serious injury NOT likely): 2M necessary.
100G(survivable): .5M(Almost there?)
214G, Kenny Bräck: .23M(Which is in range of what the Smart has).

Honestly, I wonder how many G's we should move the figures up once you start adding smart airbags and everything.

On a different topic, an extremely safe car is the Tesla Model S - which to date doesn't have a fatality or even serious injury, even in one case where the car hit concrete in excess of 100 mph, took out a bunch of concrete barrier, went through another concrete barrier, before finally hitting a tree.  Driver got out of the vehicle without serious injury.  But then the Tesla has both a huge crush zone(no engine in front to worry about), and crazy strong passenger compartment.  Still, given it's mass and strength it's strategy seems more like 'plow through the object'.  I get the feeling the concrete dividers in the video would not have stopped a Tesla.

Not to the pickup truck drivers - From what I've read of the tests I wouldn't be surprised that in a head on collision the thing is likely to act like a ramp and toss your truck into the air.  It weighs more than the F-150!

Boomhauer

  • Former Moderator, fired for embezzlement and abuse of power
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,309
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #30 on: April 07, 2014, 11:33:06 PM »
So far I haven't really encountered a lot of Smartcar drivers with smugperiority complexes.

Pious drivers, on the other hand...

Quote from: Ben
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...

Quote from: bluestarlizzard
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.

OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...

Quote from: Balog
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!

Firethorn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,789
  • Where'd my explosive space modulator go?
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #31 on: April 08, 2014, 02:45:29 AM »
So far I haven't really encountered a lot of Smartcar drivers with smugperiority complexes.

The way I look at it, the Smart is a specialist vehicle, as opposed to a more general purpose one.  It's designed to be easy to use in cities.  Consider that if 90% of people in the cities were driving one that:
1.  Death rates in accidents would likely drop.
2.  Gas prices would drop a smidge due to less fuel used
3.  Parking would be more available

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #32 on: April 08, 2014, 06:33:41 AM »
I saw the smart vs mid size car at 35mph video a while back .  Smart car was a mess and the interior looked like it would have rendered the occupants drt.  The worst designed and rated mid sized car did much better in a crash vs mid sized.

Given the smarts cost a honda civic is a better deal at the same mpg.  More room more crashworthy same mpg same or fewer dollars.

Sure it is beter than a donorcycle but ghat is a low bar.
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

RevDisk

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,633
    • RevDisk.net
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #33 on: April 08, 2014, 12:17:43 PM »
While amusing, it's still not cool to damage or destroy someone's property, just because they can. Hope the perps get caught and pay for their damage.

Smart cars are fairly good ideas for crowded cities. Highway travel would make me cringe.
"Rev, your picture is in my King James Bible, where Paul talks about "inventors of evil."  Yes, I know you'll take that as a compliment."  - Fistful, possibly highest compliment I've ever received.

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #34 on: April 08, 2014, 01:41:25 PM »
Smart cars are fairly good ideas for crowded cities. Highway travel would make me cringe.

The trouble is that why would you pay that much for a car that you can only drive in the city  ???
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,997
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #35 on: April 08, 2014, 01:45:03 PM »
The trouble is that why would you pay that much for a car that you can only drive in the city  ???

When you live in the city and don't have much reason to frequently drive outside of it but need to be able to drive within it. If I lived in NYC, Boston, Chicago or someplace like that, one of these cars may be a practical solution.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

RevDisk

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,633
    • RevDisk.net
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #36 on: April 08, 2014, 01:54:53 PM »
The trouble is that why would you pay that much for a car that you can only drive in the city  ???

I'm confused by the question. They start at $13-16k. About the same price as most Harley Davidson MSRP prices, but significantly more practical. A mini Cooper (which I would prefer for city environments) starts at $24k. There's only a couple new cars cheaper than a Smart Car: the Nissan Versa ($12.8k) and Chevrolet Spark ($12.995k).
"Rev, your picture is in my King James Bible, where Paul talks about "inventors of evil."  Yes, I know you'll take that as a compliment."  - Fistful, possibly highest compliment I've ever received.

roo_ster

  • Kakistocracy--It's What's For Dinner.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,225
  • Hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #37 on: April 08, 2014, 02:06:13 PM »
When you live in the city and don't have much reason to frequently drive outside of it but need to be able to drive within it. If I lived in NYC, Boston, Chicago or someplace like that, one of these cars may be a practical solution.

Only to those who are affluent enough to afford such a limited use car as a supplement to other autos with more capability.  Folks who can afford just one car usually need more utility than a Smart can provide.  Which is why Honda sells the heck out of the Civic, which is priced at the same level as the Smart.  Same with Mazda's 3, & Toyo's Corolla.  More car, same mpg, for the same $$$.

Don't get me wrong, I have no more animus toward the Smart than I do toward convertibles, 2-seater sport cars, motorcycles, or such limited utility autos.  All are neat-o autos, but mostly "practical" only to folks with another set of wheels.

I'm confused by the question. They start at $13-16k. About the same price as most Harley Davidson MSRP prices, but significantly more practical. A mini Cooper (which I would prefer for city environments) starts at $24k. There's only a couple new cars cheaper than a Smart Car: the Nissan Versa ($12.8k) and Chevrolet Spark ($12.995k).

Mazda 2: ($14.7k)
http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/displayPage.action?pageParameter=modelsSpecs&vehicleCode=MZ2

Mazda 3: ($16.9k)
http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/displayPage.action?pageParameter=modelsMain&vehicleCode=M3S

This is a hotly-contested segment that provides so much more value/$ than the Smart. 
Regards,

roo_ster

“Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.”
----G.K. Chesterton

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #38 on: April 08, 2014, 02:09:29 PM »
When you live in the city and don't have much reason to frequently drive outside of it but need to be able to drive within it. If I lived in NYC, Boston, Chicago or someplace like that, one of these cars may be a practical solution.
Actually, I would think that in those places public transportation would be a better option.  Maybe own a nice car to take on trips that sits in the garage most of the time.

Or maybe an electric golf cart would be more useful  :lol:
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,997
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #39 on: April 08, 2014, 02:18:19 PM »
Actually, I would think that in those places public transportation would be a better option.  Maybe own a nice car to take on trips that sits in the garage most of the time.

Or maybe an electric golf cart would be more useful  :lol:

My daughter is living in NYC right now looking for her first professional job as a commercial illustrator.  She is living with a couple of room mates who are in the same situation.  One of them has a small car, I think a Versa, that they use when they need to lug their big portfolios hither and yon.  Apparently, it is a real hassle transporting them via subway, so this is an example of how a small car comes in handy in the city.  They live in an area where they have to move the car from one side of the street to the other every day, and a garage space would cost hundreds of dollars per month.

Here in Seattle, the Zipcar and other similar car-sharing arrangements are popular, and I would go for something like that if I lived in a downtown area with good public transportation.  

PS: I forgot to mention: Up in British Columbia, in Victoria and Vancouver, the Smart Cars are way more popular than they are down here, and they park in the city with the back of the car to the curb and the nose of the car to the street or vice versa.  You often see three of them parked this way in one parallel parking space on the street.  I wonder if that argues in favor of a Smart Car over the alternatives, especially if you are young and single and don't have to worry about transporting kids.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2014, 02:28:34 PM by MillCreek »
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,179
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #40 on: April 08, 2014, 02:53:49 PM »
My daughter is living in NYC right now looking for her first professional job as a commercial illustrator.  She is living with a couple of room mates who are in the same situation.  One of them has a small car, I think a Versa, that they use when they need to lug their big portfolios hither and yon.  Apparently, it is a real hassle transporting them via subway, so this is an example of how a small car comes in handy in the city.  They live in an area where they have to move the car from one side of the street to the other every day, and a garage space would cost hundreds of dollars per month.

Here in Seattle, the Zipcar and other similar car-sharing arrangements are popular, and I would go for something like that if I lived in a downtown area with good public transportation.  

PS: I forgot to mention: Up in British Columbia, in Victoria and Vancouver, the Smart Cars are way more popular than they are down here, and they park in the city with the back of the car to the curb and the nose of the car to the street or vice versa.  You often see three of them parked this way in one parallel parking space on the street.  I wonder if that argues in favor of a Smart Car over the alternatives, especially if you are young and single and don't have to worry about transporting kids.

Native NY'er and lived in SF for a long time. ... subways and buses truly stink. They are mobile homeless shelters except that in real homeless shelters you go thru a metal detector and they sort of have security - subways and buses house people that have been defecating themselves for months to years without bathing.
They wipe their bodily fluids on any surface where your hand may go , they'll stand over you and demand change if you're sitting, they'll spill beer on you, they'll have TB and cough in your face.

Car tipping is hardly new, I recall teens doing it in NY 30 years ago .
Probably some journalist is outraged that his car got tipped even though it had an Obama/Biden sticker on it.
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."

RevDisk

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,633
    • RevDisk.net
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #41 on: April 08, 2014, 03:08:32 PM »
Native NY'er and lived in SF for a long time. ... subways and buses truly stink. They are mobile homeless shelters except that in real homeless shelters you go thru a metal detector and they sort of have security - subways and buses house people that have been defecating themselves for months to years without bathing.
They wipe their bodily fluids on any surface where your hand may go , they'll stand over you and demand change if you're sitting, they'll spill beer on you, they'll have TB and cough in your face.

Car tipping is hardly new, I recall teens doing it in NY 30 years ago .
Probably some journalist is outraged that his car got tipped even though it had an Obama/Biden sticker on it.

...

This is why I visit cities but never live in them.
"Rev, your picture is in my King James Bible, where Paul talks about "inventors of evil."  Yes, I know you'll take that as a compliment."  - Fistful, possibly highest compliment I've ever received.

Boomhauer

  • Former Moderator, fired for embezzlement and abuse of power
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,309
Re: Vandals flip Smart Cars in San Francisco
« Reply #42 on: April 08, 2014, 03:18:51 PM »
Native NY'er and lived in SF for a long time. ... subways and buses truly stink. They are mobile homeless shelters except that in real homeless shelters you go thru a metal detector and they sort of have security - subways and buses house people that have been defecating themselves for months to years without bathing.
They wipe their bodily fluids on any surface where your hand may go , they'll stand over you and demand change if you're sitting, they'll spill beer on you, they'll have TB and cough in your face.

Or they'll kill you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOKVKw_TDrI


Quote from: Ben
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...

Quote from: bluestarlizzard
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.

OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...

Quote from: Balog
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!