Author Topic: Food police  (Read 2263 times)

RadioFreeSeaLab

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,200
Food police
« on: September 26, 2006, 09:07:24 PM »
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/D/DIET_TRANS_FAT_BAN?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-09-26-18-13-07

Quote
By DAVID B. CARUSO
Associated Press Writer

NEW YORK (AP)  Three years after the city banned smoking in restaurants, health officials are talking about prohibiting something they say is almost as bad: artificial trans fatty acids.

The city health department unveiled a proposal Tuesday that would bar cooks at any of the citys 24,600 food service establishments from using ingredients that contain the artery-clogging substance, commonly listed on food labels as partially hydrogenated oil.

Artificial trans fats are found in some shortenings, margarine and frying oils and turn up in foods from pie crusts to french fries to doughnuts.

Doctors agree that trans fats are unhealthy in nearly any amount, but a spokesman for the restaurant industry said he was stunned the city would seek to ban a legal ingredient found in millions of American kitchens.

Labeling is one thing, but when they totally ban a product, it goes well beyond what we think is prudent and acceptable, said Chuck Hunt, executive vice president of the citys chapter of the New York State Restaurant Association.

He said the proposal could create havoc: Cooks would be forced to discard old recipes and scrutinize every ingredient in their pantry. A restaurant could face a fine if an inspector finds the wrong type of vegetable shortening on its shelves.

The proposal also would create a huge problem for national chains. Among the fast foods that would need to get an overhaul or face a ban: McDonalds french fries, Kentucky Fried Chicken and several varieties of Dunkin Donuts.

Health Commissioner Thomas Frieden acknowledged that the ban would be a challenge for restaurants, but he said trans fats can easily be replaced with substitute oils that taste the same or better and are far less unhealthy.

It is a dangerous and unnecessary ingredient, Frieden said. No one will miss it when its gone.

A similar ban on trans fats in restaurant food has been proposed in Chicago and is still under consideration, although it has been ridiculed by some as unnecessary government meddling.

The latest version of the Chicago plan would only apply to companies with annual revenues of more than $20 million, a provision aimed exclusively at fast-food giants.

A few companies have moved to eliminate trans fats on their own.

Wendys announced in August that it had switched to a new cooking oil that contains no trans fatty acids. Crisco now sells a shortening that contains zero trans fats. Frito-Lay removed trans fats from its Doritos and Cheetos. Krafts took trans fats out of Oreos.

McDonalds began using a trans fat-free cooking oil in Denmark after that country banned artificial trans fats in processed food, but it has yet to do so in the United States.

Walt Riker, vice president of corporate communications at McDonalds, said in a statement Tuesday that the company would review New Yorks proposal.

McDonalds knows this is an important issue, which is why we continue to test in earnest to find ways to further reduce (trans fatty acid) levels, he said.

New Yorks health department had asked restaurants to impose a voluntary ban last year but found use of trans fats unchanged in recent surveys.

Under the New York proposal, restaurants would need to get artificial trans fats out of cooking oils, margarine and shortening by July 1, 2007, and all other foodstuffs by July 1, 2008. It would not affect grocery stores. It also would not apply to naturally occurring trans fats, which are found in some meats and dairy.

The Board of Health has yet to approve the proposal and will not do so until at least December, Frieden said.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration began requiring food labels to list trans fats in January.

Dr. Walter Willett, chairman of the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard University School of Public Health, praised New York health officials for considering a ban, which he said could save lives.

Artificial trans fats are very toxic, and they almost surely causes tens of thousands of premature deaths each year, he said. The federal government should have done this long ago.
Ah, America, land of the free, where the government wants to tell you what you can and can't eat.

Guest

  • Guest
Food police
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2006, 10:00:30 PM »
Alleviate the Fat that fuels Tryanny - and we will all be healthier.

Steve

HForrest

  • Guest
Food police
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2006, 10:24:47 PM »
Unfortunately, I'm not surprised at all to see this happening.

spinr

  • Guest
Food police
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2006, 02:34:02 AM »
FRAK!

Let's just hurry the hell up and ban life!

That'll solve everything...

angry

Dannyboy

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,340
Food police
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2006, 03:49:48 AM »
The thing that kills me is that most of this crap comes from people who support abortion on the grounds of, "my body, my choice."  At least with smoking bans, you can make a somewhat rational argument regarding bans, although I don't agree with said argument.  These healthists are just out and out hypocrites.  I guess only certain choices are allowed.  

I read yesterday, that some putz in the Bronx wants to change zoning laws to keep fast food restaurants out of the area because the poor people in the area are too fat.
Oh, Lord, please let me be as sanctimonious and self-righteous as those around me, so that I may fit in.

Chris

  • Guest
Food police
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2006, 04:20:26 AM »
Ever see the movie Demolition Man.  Bad Stallone movie, but that's not the key.  I recall laughing when I watched it.  The Terminator had turned politician, and a Constitutional amendment had been passed allowing him o run for President.  Taco Bell had become the sole surviving restaurant.  Surveillance cameras did the real policing.  And anything bad for you was illegal.

Well, ten years or so later, Arnold is the Governator.  Some Republican insiders I know say there's serious talk of a Constitutional Amendment to let him run for the White House.  Taco Bells are everywhere.  Police Caeras sprout up like dandelions.  And now, anything bad for you is being banned...

Maybe the film was not just a bad movie, but a prophesy...

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 45,988
  • I'm an Extremist!
Food police
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2006, 05:49:53 AM »
It won't be long till they put Pax in the atmo.
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,396
  • My prepositions are on/in
Food police
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2006, 06:00:23 AM »
A murder-death-kill!  What do we do?
"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Food police
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2006, 07:41:51 AM »
This actually doesn't surprise me at all. We were talking about life expectancy, the rising cost of health care, shortage of health care workers and overall life long health the other day. One of things that was brought up is that if health care needs out weigh health care supply that there might become a "quota" system in who gets health care and who doesn't. They were reading somewhere that it might be determined on your lifestyle and diet, like a life long holistic health.

For example if you eat a lot of trans fat food and refuse to change your diet you might get moved down the list for a endarterectomy (surgical procedure to remove plaque in the artery) compared to someone who eats a low fat diet.


-C
Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

The Rabbi

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,435
  • "Ahh, Jeez. Not this sh*t again!"
Food police
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2006, 08:25:53 AM »
For people who rely on government dole I don't have a problem rationing it.  People expect state of the art health care for free.  That is just unrealistic.
Fight state-sponsored Islamic terrorism: Bomb France now!

Vote Libertarian: It Not Like It Matters Anyway.

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Food police
« Reply #10 on: September 27, 2006, 08:40:29 AM »
If the arguement is "We're paying for their health care, therefore we have an iterest in making sure everyone lives healthy", woulnd't the proper alternative be to cease paying for their healthcare instead of trying to rule their lives?

The Rabbi

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,435
  • "Ahh, Jeez. Not this sh*t again!"
Food police
« Reply #11 on: September 27, 2006, 08:45:47 AM »
Quote from: Headless Thompson Gunner
If the arguement is "We're paying for their health care, therefore we have an iterest in making sure everyone lives healthy", woulnd't the proper alternative be to cease paying for their healthcare instead of trying to rule their lives?
What do you think people in that situation would prefer?

I agree 100% that the gov't needs to get out of the health care providing business.  But until that happens this is the system we have.
Fight state-sponsored Islamic terrorism: Bomb France now!

Vote Libertarian: It Not Like It Matters Anyway.

lupinus

  • Southern Mod Trimutive Emeritus
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9,178
Food police
« Reply #12 on: September 27, 2006, 08:54:12 AM »
You know I try my best to avoid eating the stuff but you should have the right to sit your self down with a tub of crisco, a bottle of herseys syrup, a big ol spoon and eat yourself into the big corenary health care unit in the sky if you want to.  Just don't expect my tax dollars to pay for your chu down here while you are in transit and we're cool.

If anything, make the resturant put a little mark on the menu letting you know what does or doesn't have the stuff in it kind of liek they do now to let you know something has nuts in it, eating undercooked meat can be dangerous, etc.

That I would support because it lets people know what they are eating.  But banning it?  Hell no.
That is all. *expletive deleted*ck you all, eat *expletive deleted*it, and die in a fire. I have considered writing here a long parting section dedicated to each poster, but I have decided, at length, against it. *expletive deleted*ck you all and Hail Satan.

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Food police
« Reply #13 on: September 27, 2006, 09:04:33 AM »
Quote from: The Rabbi
Quote from: Headless Thompson Gunner
If the arguement is "We're paying for their health care, therefore we have an iterest in making sure everyone lives healthy", woulnd't the proper alternative be to cease paying for their healthcare instead of trying to rule their lives?
What do you think people in that situation would prefer?

I agree 100% that the gov't needs to get out of the health care providing business.  But until that happens this is the system we have.
I know what they would prefer.  I want to make sure as many other people as possible know it to.

They aren't interested in making people healthier, they want control over other peoples' lives.

The Rabbi

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,435
  • "Ahh, Jeez. Not this sh*t again!"
Food police
« Reply #14 on: September 27, 2006, 09:23:13 AM »
Quote from: Headless Thompson Gunner
I know what they would prefer.  I want to make sure as many other people as possible know it to.

They aren't interested in making people healthier, they want control over other peoples' lives.
Who is "they"?  The doctors?  The drug companies?  The insurance companies?  The idiot city council considering this stupid measure?
Fight state-sponsored Islamic terrorism: Bomb France now!

Vote Libertarian: It Not Like It Matters Anyway.

Nightfall

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 916
Food police
« Reply #15 on: September 27, 2006, 10:48:41 AM »
Quote from: Dannyboy
I read yesterday, that some putz in the Bronx wants to change zoning laws to keep fast food restaurants out of the area because the poor people in the area are too fat.
Just how poor are you if you can afford to get fat?
It is difficult if not impossible to reason a person out of a position they did not reason themselves into. - 230RN

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Food police
« Reply #16 on: September 27, 2006, 11:06:21 AM »
Quote from: Nightfall
Just how poor are you if you can afford to get fat?
unhealthy food is some of the cheapest food we have.

Lets see Banquet TV dinners are usally around $1 a piece.  Pot Pies are 3 for $2.

Both are full of fat and sodium.

-C
Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

mfree

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,637
Food police
« Reply #17 on: September 27, 2006, 11:25:18 AM »
Charby's 100% about the cheap food. Where poor food used to mean lots of dried beans, preserved meats, and corn products, now it's processed "plastic" foods that are a lot less healthy than the previous.

RadioFreeSeaLab

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,200
Food police
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2006, 11:27:46 AM »
Quote from: mfree
Charby's 100% about the cheap food. Where poor food used to mean lots of dried beans, preserved meats, and corn products, now it's processed "plastic" foods that are a lot less healthy than the previous.
Quite true.
I eat poor food, and it's pretty hard to eat healthy.

mfree

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,637
Food police
« Reply #19 on: September 27, 2006, 02:04:13 PM »
You know though (thread drift), you can still find the old "poor food" and it's still cheap. You just have to plan for preparation work.

A bag of split peas, a small onion, and a can of cheap mixed vegetables shouldn't run you more than $3 and will last you 5 days of lunches. Add ham for another buck, but beware the time factor....

CAnnoneer

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,136
Food police
« Reply #20 on: September 27, 2006, 05:11:22 PM »
Actually, it all makes perfect sense. NYC has chosen socialism, and thus MUST outlaw trans-fats so that they do not bankrupt public healthcare. The alternative is completely private healthcare and insurance, so that everyone can kill themselves with a spoon, cigarette, glass, needle, etc. without collatoral damage. I'd prefer the latter, because I think it would be better for individual freedoms and the gene pool.

Headless Thompson Gunner

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,517
Food police
« Reply #21 on: September 27, 2006, 06:22:56 PM »
Quote from: The Rabbi
Quote from: Headless Thompson Gunner
I know what they would prefer.  I want to make sure as many other people as possible know it to.

They aren't interested in making people healthier, they want control over other peoples' lives.
Who is "they"?  The doctors?  The drug companies?  The insurance companies?  The idiot city council considering this stupid measure?
"They" are the do-gooders in government, and those that support them, who can't stand to leave everyone else well enough alone.  Obesity is a self-inflicted condition.  As such, the state has no business getting involved.  

Wanna kill yourself with Big Macs?  Fine, enjoy!  I can certainly think of worse ways to die.

Of course, if government held that attitude they wouldn't be able to enjoy this giant new source of tax revenue...

CAnnoneer

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,136
Food police
« Reply #22 on: September 27, 2006, 06:32:46 PM »
Quote from: Headless Thompson Gunner
 Obesity is a self-inflicted condition...  Of course, if government held that attitude they wouldn't be able to enjoy this giant new source of tax revenue...
It is not exactly self-inflicted. I would not understate the importance of personal responsibility, but the reality is that the gov is in bed with the food companies, which actually are the tobacco companies (Phillip Morris purchased Nabisco. How wild is that?). If you do not believe me, read a new book called "UltraMetabolism". It is all explained there, including the gov stupidity in attacking natural fats and promoting a wrong food pyramid that leads to prediabetes and fatty liver. It is not even a conspiracy theory - all the facts are public knowledge, but one cannot see the forest for the trees...

The Rabbi

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,435
  • "Ahh, Jeez. Not this sh*t again!"
Food police
« Reply #23 on: September 28, 2006, 02:43:05 AM »
Quote from: Headless Thompson Gunner
Quote from: The Rabbi
Quote from: Headless Thompson Gunner
I know what they would prefer.  I want to make sure as many other people as possible know it to.

They aren't interested in making people healthier, they want control over other peoples' lives.
Who is "they"?  The doctors?  The drug companies?  The insurance companies?  The idiot city council considering this stupid measure?
"They" are the do-gooders in government, and those that support them, who can't stand to leave everyone else well enough alone.  Obesity is a self-inflicted condition.  As such, the state has no business getting involved.  

Wanna kill yourself with Big Macs?  Fine, enjoy!  I can certainly think of worse ways to die.

Of course, if government held that attitude they wouldn't be able to enjoy this giant new source of tax revenue...
It is part of a mode that exists only since WW2.  If there is a problem, then it is up to gov't to "do something" to solve the problem.  Just once I'd like to see a politician questioned "what are you going to do about X" and him respond "X is a big problem.  But it isn't the gov'ts problem.  People more involved with it need to solve this without our help."  I'd vote for that guy any day.
Fight state-sponsored Islamic terrorism: Bomb France now!

Vote Libertarian: It Not Like It Matters Anyway.

The Rabbi

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,435
  • "Ahh, Jeez. Not this sh*t again!"
Food police
« Reply #24 on: September 28, 2006, 02:48:20 AM »
Quote from: CAnnoneer
Quote from: Headless Thompson Gunner
 Obesity is a self-inflicted condition...  Of course, if government held that attitude they wouldn't be able to enjoy this giant new source of tax revenue...
It is not exactly self-inflicted. I would not understate the importance of personal responsibility, but the reality is that the gov is in bed with the food companies, which actually are the tobacco companies (Phillip Morris purchased Nabisco. How wild is that?). If you do not believe me, read a new book called "UltraMetabolism". It is all explained there, including the gov stupidity in attacking natural fats and promoting a wrong food pyramid that leads to prediabetes and fatty liver. It is not even a conspiracy theory - all the facts are public knowledge, but one cannot see the forest for the trees...
Yes!  It is all gov't conspiracy with Big Oil, Big Tobacco, Big Mac etc etc.  That explains it perfectly.  Certainly more convincingly than people like fat and salt. Companies are in business to sell products and sell what people like to eat.  People make themselves fat not just through food choice but also through lifestyle choice (no exercise).
But it is more convenient to beleive in massive conspiracies by gov't and Big Business.
Fight state-sponsored Islamic terrorism: Bomb France now!

Vote Libertarian: It Not Like It Matters Anyway.