Author Topic: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation  (Read 2854 times)

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62,153
  • My prepositions are on/in
That's what I found surprising about this article. (Or the first two paragraphs, which are all I read.)

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/poll-shows-giant-gap-public-scientists-28583862
Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?
--Thomas Jefferson

Tuco

  • Fastest non-sequitur in the West.
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,216
  • If you miss you had better miss very well
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2015, 09:49:34 PM »
That's what I found surprising about this article. (Or the first two paragraphs, which are all I read.)

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/poll-shows-giant-gap-public-scientists-28583862

People didn't believe Malthus, either.
No,
Wait.
7-11 was a part time job.

Ron

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,883
  • Like a tree planted by the rivers of water
    • What I believe ...
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2015, 10:40:45 PM »
Follow the money
For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity, that they may be without excuse. Because knowing God, they didn’t glorify him as God, and didn’t give thanks, but became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

cambeul41

  • friend
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 403
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2015, 11:07:33 AM »
Quote
Eighty-seven percent of scientists said global warming is mostly due to human activity, while only half of the public did.

But Ron wisely suggests that we . . .

Quote
Follow the money
?It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.?
?Thomas Sowell

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34,595
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2015, 11:42:26 AM »
Quote
In eight of 13 science-oriented issues, there was a 20-percentage-point or higher gap separating the opinions of the public and members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, according to survey work by the Pew Research Center. The gaps didn't correlate to any liberal-conservative split; the scientists at times take more traditionally conservative views and at times more liberal.
Who is the American Association for the Advancemetn of Science and what is their membership?  Anyone know?

Just curious since all the "scientists" polled are in that organization.  Do they have any general political leaning and such?
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34,595
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2015, 11:45:00 AM »
I would also be curious if the polling was equally different if they narrowed the "public" side of the poll to college graduates or somehow filtered out completely non-technical people. 

“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Ron

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,883
  • Like a tree planted by the rivers of water
    • What I believe ...
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2015, 01:21:52 PM »
Our modern secular priesthood has its own dogma.

If you want to be part of the new mystery religion you must accept the doctrine of the depravity of the human race in its sinning against planet earth. We are not part of the system but a plague or parasite that is killing its host.

The apocalypse will occur unless we heed our priests and prophets of scientism. They will lead us in the way of sustainability. The masses will have to suffer a lesser lifestyle with fewer children to save earth; even as our betters are allowed to breed and consume as they see fit, as depicting their elevated station in life :D     
For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity, that they may be without excuse. Because knowing God, they didn’t glorify him as God, and didn’t give thanks, but became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

GigaBuist

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,345
    • http://www.justinbuist.org/blog/
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2015, 12:27:33 AM »
I would also be curious if the polling was equally different if they narrowed the "public" side of the poll to college graduates or somehow filtered out completely non-technical people. 

I doubt it would change.  Educated liberals are mostly making up the anti-vaccine crowd.  I've seen STEM type guys all over the board with GMO and pesticides and such.

You'd get a bigger swing in how you phrased the questions because the problem isn't intellect (rare that I say that) but rather raw knowledge and we all know from political polling on the gun issue phrasing means a lot. 

Let's take GMO crops for instance.

Q1: "Do you think genetically modified crops are safe?"
... You'll get answers of No a lot on that one from the general public.  Because the question gives them very little information.

Q1A: "Do you think corn crops that have been sprayed with a natural organic pesticide that has never been known to cause harm to humans is safe?"
... You'll get a Yes out of most on that one.
Q2A: "Do you think corn that can make this organic pesticide on its own is safer to eat than crops treated with more traditional organophosphate insecticide, a chemical class created during WWII mostly intended to kill other human beings but was also adopted to kill insects?"
... You'll probably get a yes out of that one too. But the same person might object to GMOs if just ask them about GMOs.

People are stupid.  I'm sorry.  Oklahoma State University just came out with a study and a throw-away question was should food that contains DNA be labeled as such; 80% of the survey takers said yes.

You can't rationalize with the general public.  You just deal with them.

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62,153
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2015, 08:10:31 AM »

Who is the American Association for the Advancemetn of Science and what is their membership?  Anyone know?

Just curious since all the "scientists" polled are in that organization.  Do they have any general political leaning and such?

Oh, you noticed that, too?


Educated liberals are mostly making up the anti-vaccine crowd. 

This really surprises me. I can't recall where I read it (probably vaccines screwing up my memory).
Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?
--Thomas Jefferson

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,217
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #9 on: January 31, 2015, 09:07:46 AM »
I am surprised that you all are unfamiliar with the AAAS.  It is the world's largest general scientific society covering a wide spectrum of scientific studies.  Their main journal, Science, is one of the best science academic journals in the world.  Their primary aim is to use science for the betterment of people.

_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #10 on: January 31, 2015, 09:54:23 AM »
I doubt it would change.  Educated liberals are mostly making up the anti-vaccine crowd.  I've seen STEM type guys all over the board with GMO and pesticides and such.

Weird, almost all the anti vax people I know are non college educated uber conservatives. Mostly they don't understand herd immunity and scared that their kid is going to be the 1:100k that is allergic to the vaccine and will die.

I'm a STEM educated person, and I have mixed opinions on GMO crops. Not because they are bad for human consumption, but what will they mutate into in the future. Also with smartstax crops, the producer quit practicing integrated pest management and now we have some pretty noxious resistant weeds and other pests. Such as round up ready corn and soy, where the producer just Glyphosate'd the world, or with BT corn and not planting non BT refuge in the field.
Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,217
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2015, 10:10:19 AM »
Weird, almost all the anti vax people I know are non college educated uber conservatives. Mostly they don't understand herd immunity and scared that their kid is going to be the 1:100k that is allergic to the vaccine and will die.

When I worked for the healthcare systems that primarily took care of middle-class patients, the anti-vax people were almost always white women, presumably educated.  When I worked for the healthcare systems that primarily took care of poor people, almost none of them are anti-vax.  Interesting, and this may be entirely a function of the area (the greater Seattle area) in which I have worked.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

charby

  • Necromancer
  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 29,295
  • APS's Resident Sikh/Muslim
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #12 on: January 31, 2015, 10:17:55 AM »
When I worked for the healthcare systems that primarily took care of middle-class patients, the anti-vax people were almost always white women, presumably educated.  When I worked for the healthcare systems that primarily took care of poor people, almost none of them are anti-vax.  Interesting, and this may be entirely a function of the area (the greater Seattle area) in which I have worked.

I can see poor people being like that, especially with a good public health education policy. Be vaccinated, reduce your time (and cost of) being sick.
Iowa- 88% more livable that the rest of the US

Uranus is a gas giant.

Team 444: Member# 536

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62,153
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #13 on: January 31, 2015, 11:42:16 AM »
The only anti-vaxer I can think of, off-hand, is Conspiracy Cow-Orker; a college-educated, middle-class, white guy. He says that his nephew (or somebody) was a perfectly normal child until he got vaxxed, and has not spoken a word since. It made him autistic. CC doesn't trust much of anything out of modern medicine, or the FDA that "tells you what you have to eat, and what drugs you have to take."

Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?
--Thomas Jefferson

Tuco

  • Fastest non-sequitur in the West.
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,216
  • If you miss you had better miss very well
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #14 on: January 31, 2015, 11:52:37 AM »
Oklahoma State University just came out with a study and a throw-away question was should food that contains DNA be labeled as such; 80% of the survey takers said yes.

Simply delicious.
7-11 was a part time job.

Ron

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,883
  • Like a tree planted by the rivers of water
    • What I believe ...
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #15 on: January 31, 2015, 12:21:42 PM »
Most articles I've read lay the anti vax hysteria at the feet of liberals.

Here is a non scientific "study" of the phenomenon.

http://www.realclearscience.com/journal_club/2014/10/20/are_liberals_or_conservatives_more_anti-vaccine_108905.html
For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity, that they may be without excuse. Because knowing God, they didn’t glorify him as God, and didn’t give thanks, but became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.

Boomhauer

  • Former Moderator, fired for embezzlement and abuse of power
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,513
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #16 on: January 31, 2015, 05:03:07 PM »
Quote
the anti-vax people were almost always white women, presumably educated.

They are the ones that primarily share all of the anti vaccination, anti GMO, "wierd health tricks that will make doctors hate you" and the various moronic "homeopathic cures that doctor's don't want you to know about it", fad diets, and so forth on Facebook and through chain emails.



Quote from: Ben
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...

Quote from: bluestarlizzard
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.

OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...

Quote from: Balog
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62,153
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #17 on: January 31, 2015, 06:54:21 PM »
They are the ones that primarily share all of the anti vaccination, anti GMO, "wierd health tricks that will make doctors hate you" and the various moronic "homeopathic cures that doctor's don't want you to know about it", fad diets, and so forth on Facebook and through chain emails.


Makes sense. Same ones that are worried about high-capacity, military-grade gonkulators. WITH BAYONET LUGS!
Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?
--Thomas Jefferson

makattak

  • Dark Lord of the Cis
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,022
They are the ones that primarily share all of the anti vaccination, anti GMO, "wierd health tricks that will make doctors hate you" and the various moronic "homeopathic cures that doctor's don't want you to know about it", fad diets, and so forth on Facebook and through chain emails.

People have too much leisure and not enough working to stave off starvation and death with a side of fear of disease that can strike anyone dead at any time with no remedies available.

Not to worry though- we'll be there again soon enough.
I wish the Ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened.

So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us. There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil. Bilbo was meant to find the Ring. In which case, you also were meant to have it. And that is an encouraging thought

zxcvbob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,498
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #19 on: February 01, 2015, 10:45:51 AM »

military-grade gonkulators

Great word.  :laugh: I havent heard used in years.
"It's good, though..."

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34,595
Re: Re: Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #20 on: February 02, 2015, 11:12:14 AM »
People have too much leisure and not enough working to stave off starvation and death with a side of fear of disease that can strike anyone dead at any time with no remedies available.

Not to worry though- we'll be there again soon enough.
I was thinking along the lines of people think they are smart enough to understand medical issues but really aren't.  They start reading "stuff" about vaccines, can't differentiate fact from fiction, and won't or can't talk to their doctor about which is correct. 

It reminds me of all the people I have had show me links that "back up" or "prove" their global waming claims.  When you look at the link, it either has no facts at all or is so full of "maybe" and "we think" language that you realize the people writing the article don't know anything either.  The alternative is articles that absolutely prove something, but not what they are claiming, though they act like it does.
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 34,595
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #21 on: February 02, 2015, 11:14:14 AM »
Sometimes I think maybe my mother is the only person left who actually remembers and applies stuff her grandmother taught her about cleanliness and illness.  I think some of the problems are a complete lack of education and parents who don't teach their kids anything. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

KD5NRH

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,926
  • I'm too sexy for you people.
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #22 on: February 02, 2015, 01:44:51 PM »
Q2A: "Do you think corn that can make this organic pesticide on its own is safer to eat than crops treated with more traditional organophosphate insecticide, a chemical class created during WWII mostly intended to kill other human beings but was also adopted to kill insects?"

I'm waiting for cornacco, the naturally nicotine-laced corn.

If you can make it also produce caffeine and a mild painkiller, I'll eat my veggies every day.

zxcvbob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,498
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #23 on: February 02, 2015, 02:01:50 PM »
I'm waiting for cornacco, the naturally nicotine-laced corn.


"Holy Moses! It DOES taste like Grandma!"
"It's good, though..."

Mannlicher

  • Grumpy Old Gator
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,435
  • The Bonnie Blue
Re: "Scientists" more prone to believe in the dangers of overpopulation
« Reply #24 on: February 02, 2015, 03:21:52 PM »
this kind of stuff reminds me that many scientists are educated far beyond their intelligence.