IMHO, the gay couple was not looking for a cake, they were looking for a fight.
IMHO you're 100% correct. I think Fistful is as well. Or at least the dude that went into the bakery. The gay folks just picked one they could win, with the laws as they are currently written.
So if hypothetically you wanted a gay wedding cake, why would you seek out a baker who did not want to sell you one and then sue them, rather than go someplace else that actually wanted you business? (Would you eat anything cooked under duress by someone who disliked you or strongly disapproved of what you were doing?) I'd be afraid of what disgusting "extras" I got with the cake. It's like insulting the cook or waitress at a restaurant *before* you get your food.
There is much wisdom here.
If the baker is forced at gunpoint to bake the cake, and therefore participate in your so-called "wedding" that they find repugnant, how is that not slavery?
Well it's not slavery, because you don't own them. They could legally say "*expletive deleted*ck it, and you!" close their bakery and not participate. Not a great choice but not slavery. Let's not call a hoe a spade. I will however 100% agree that it's bullshit. You should be able to contract, or not with anyone for any reason. If you don't want to bake a cake because the groom's tux is ugly, fine. Or it's a mixed race couple, fine. That is, unfortunately, only my opinion at the moment. Our society has decided that some of the discrimination we had was so bad that we passed laws exchanging our freedom of association to stop discrimination. In CO (where this all took place) it is codified in law that you can not discriminate based on sexual orientation. If your business is supporting weddings, then you have to support gay weddings if contracted. It sucks, but that's the current law.
If you want to talk about civil disobedience we can. They could just say no and take the fine. They could do any of the sit-inesque stuff that was done to get anti discrimination laws passed in the first place. Every choice one makes has consequences. Weight them and choose. What you can't do is fight the battle in a court of law, and not expect the clear law to prevail. (well, you can but it's stupid.)
Similarly, you can't equate two different situations and smugly claim hypocrisy. Well, again, you can but folks will call you out on it.
When you find a bakery that refuses to bake an Easter cake,
because it's Christian, you can claim some animals are more equal.