Author Topic: What is wrong with this picture? (Read 2051 times)

41magsnub · « **Reply #2 on:** July 21, 2015, 10:35:39 PM »

Tacti-crocs! What else can you find wrong?

freakazoid · « **Reply #3 on:** July 21, 2015, 10:37:26 PM »

What's going on with the stock on the older guy? Kind of looks like it attaches to the lower part of the lower receiver.
What's wrong is he also has no rear sight.

BryanP · « **Reply #4 on:** July 21, 2015, 10:43:15 PM »

Quote from: freakazoid on July 21, 2015, 10:37:26 PM

What's going on with the stock on the older guy? Kind of looks like it attaches to the lower part of the lower receiver.
What's wrong is he also has no rear sight.

It's one of those goofy bump fire stocks.

Fitz · « **Reply #5 on:** July 21, 2015, 11:09:08 PM »

you mean, other than private citizens having to protect the military from violence because the government wont allow the military to protect themselves?

nothing

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #6 on:** July 21, 2015, 11:11:36 PM »

They're both facing the same direction. Also, who's in overwatch?

(Yes, I know, it's for the picture, and so is the low ready position.)

RoadKingLarry · « **Reply #7 on:** July 21, 2015, 11:20:20 PM »

Quote from: freakazoid on July 21, 2015, 10:37:26 PM

What's going on with the stock on the older guy? Kind of looks like it attaches to the lower part of the lower receiver.
What's wrong is he also has no rear sight.

Looks like some kind of holo sight under the older guys left hand.

41magsnub · « **Reply #8 on:** July 21, 2015, 11:40:13 PM »

The first two guys I don't see a problem with other than some interesting things about the old guys rifle. My pic though, probably illegal AOW (maybe he has a tax stamp... maybe), crocs, and no rear sight. Not the image or person we want. If he could afford a tax stamp he could afford an MBUS...

MechAg94 · « **Reply #9 on:** July 22, 2015, 12:00:43 AM »

Quote from: RoadKingLarry on July 21, 2015, 11:20:20 PM

Looks like some kind of holo sight under the older guys left hand.

Is that something mounted under the barrel out past the front sight post?

Perd Hapley · « **Reply #10 on:** July 22, 2015, 12:22:37 AM »

Quote from: 41magsnub on July 21, 2015, 11:40:13 PM

The first two guys I don't see a problem with other than some interesting things about the old guys rifle. My pic though, probably illegal AOW (maybe he has a tax stamp... maybe), crocs, and no rear sight. Not the image or person we want. If he could afford a tax stamp he could afford an MBUS...

I don't see a front sight, either.

If you really wanted to be a one-man (or two-man) security force for your local recruiting office, would it possibly make more sense to sit in a car, some place with a good field of view/fire?

AmbulanceDriver · « **Reply #11 on:** July 22, 2015, 12:25:26 AM »

Quote from: 41magsnub on July 21, 2015, 11:40:13 PM

The first two guys I don't see a problem with other than some interesting things about the old guys rifle. My pic though, probably illegal AOW (maybe he has a tax stamp... maybe), crocs, and no rear sight. Not the image or person we want. If he could afford a tax stamp he could afford an MBUS...

Nope, that's a Sig brace on the back of that thing. So technically a pistol until he shoulders it (because again, the BATFEces got all asswipey and decided that it wasn't an SBR until they decided it was.)

ETA:

Of course, that doesn't account for the VFG, which is a no-no on a pistol. So yeah, you're right. AOW... That's what I get for not looking closely.... And yeah, the lack of any apparent sights makes me wonder if he's just gonna go all gangsta aiming and hence doesn't feel the need for sights.

SADShooter · « **Reply #12 on:** July 22, 2015, 12:40:24 AM »

Too much poodle shooter, not enough Man Gun.

brimic · « **Reply #13 on:** July 22, 2015, 08:01:43 AM »

Quote

What's wrong is he also has no rear sight.

You don't need sights if you have a bump stock.

wmenorr67 · « **Reply #14 on:** July 22, 2015, 08:04:11 AM »

Second pic, take your damn booger hook off the damn trigger.

makattak · « **Reply #15 on:** July 22, 2015, 08:19:12 AM »

Quote from: wmenorr67 on July 22, 2015, 08:04:11 AM

Second pic, take your damn booger hook off the damn trigger.

It would also be nice if he wouldn't nap on guard duty.

dogmush · « **Reply #16 on:** July 22, 2015, 08:30:32 AM »

Quote from: 41magsnub on July 21, 2015, 11:40:13 PM

The first two guys I don't see a problem with other than some interesting things about the old guys rifle. My pic though, probably illegal AOW (maybe he has a tax stamp... maybe), crocs, and no rear sight. Not the image or person we want. If he could afford a tax stamp he could afford an MBUS...

Quote from: AmbulanceDriver

ETA: Of course, that doesn't account for the VFG, which is a no-no on a pistol. So yeah, you're right. AOW...

Not quite.

In the definition of an AOW, it mentions weapon capable of being concealed. The ATF has long held that a weapon over 26" in over all length is not "concealable" (Unless you actually conceal one, but that's a different story.)

Most AR pistols, with a ~10" barrel and sig brace get over the 26" mark, so adding a VFG doesn't make an AOW, it converts the pistol to a regular title 1 "firearm". (measure twice). Same deal as that birds head grip and 14" barreled shotgun you see floating around.

The particular AR on Mr. Day-Glo looks long enough to be legal, but without a measuring stick I wouldn't swear to it. Nothing forgives the Crocs though.

ETA: Link to OEM firearm with the discussed features and a determination letter explaining the legalese.

lee n. field · « **Reply #17 on:** July 22, 2015, 08:32:57 AM »

Needs a Mosin, with a 2 foot pokey thing on the end.

Fly320s · « **Reply #18 on:** July 22, 2015, 08:33:51 AM »

Quote from: 41magsnub on July 21, 2015, 10:35:39 PM

Tacti-crocs! What else can you find wrong?

That shirt.

T.O.M. · « **Reply #19 on:** July 22, 2015, 08:55:06 AM »

Personally, I was wondering where the spare mags and back-up sidearms were for all three...

dogmush · « **Reply #20 on:** July 22, 2015, 09:23:00 AM »

Quote from: Chris on July 22, 2015, 08:55:06 AM

Personally, I was wondering where the spare mags and back-up sidearms were for all three...

Or body armor......

Battle Monkey of Zardoz · « **Reply #21 on:** July 22, 2015, 09:26:23 AM »

Quote from: Chris on July 22, 2015, 08:55:06 AM

Personally, I was wondering where the spare mags and back-up sidearms were for all three...

^
This.

charby · « **Reply #22 on:** July 22, 2015, 10:00:57 AM »

No Subaru Brat parked out front?

K Frame · « **Reply #23 on:** July 22, 2015, 10:24:04 AM »

Actually that shirt's not a bad idea. People who are doing this of their own volition should be wearing something very distinctive so they can be easily identified to police if a situation erupts. As in "the civilian overwatchers are wearing fluorescent green T shirts!"

vaskidmark · « **Reply #24 on:** July 22, 2015, 10:32:14 AM »

Quote from: wmenorr67 on July 22, 2015, 08:04:11 AM

Second pic, take your damn booger hook off the damn trigger.

Sorry, but he's actually working very hard to make sure that does not happen. Left hand over extended and indexed trigger finger to prevent "creep".

I swear, it seems all of you get your tactical training at brick-and-mortar schools with recognized instructors, as opposed to us Souper Extreem Tier Two (one better than Tier One

) Operators who pick up tactics and techniques by osmosis over the internet. Read it once and we can perform it flawlessly while being attacked from the front by a flamethrower and from the rear by our mother in law.

stay safe.

News:

Author Topic: What is wrong with this picture? (Read 2051 times)