As others have suggested, too much detail, and too "high diction" for general application.
I would suggest making a few bullet points (pun intended?) and then linking to sources with more detail. Just hit the high points. For example:
If gun control were about reducing shooting deaths, you'd go after handguns. They are used to kill many, many times more people.
ARs and AKs used in mass killings in the U.S. are almost never fully automatic. They work just the same as hunting rifles people have been using for the past hundred years, except they're less powerful, and don't have to be reloaded as often.
If "assault rifles" have no place in society, why do the police have them? (Link to examples of "assault rifles" used in self-defense)
If the 2A doesn't protect your right to military weapons, even full-auto ones, why does it mention the militia at all?
Stuff like that.