http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?p=18644572#post18644572
Not logged in. Can't view pics. So the heck with it.
However, as I once told my sons about handguns... zero sight radius = zero accuracy. You do the geometry.
<pause>
But just to save you the trouble of booting up your CAD software to solve this...
At, say, 50 yards (1800 inches), a nice compromise distance for both handgun and long arm ranges, a .005" absolute error in sighting results in X, where X is the unknown error in impact point...
For a 6" sight radius:
.005" is to
6" as X is to 1800"
(.005" x 1800") ÷ 6" = X, a miss by 1.5 inches
For an 18" sight radius:
.005" is to
18" as X is to 1800"
(.005" x 1800") ÷ 18" = X, a miss by 0.5 inches.
If my arithmetic is correct.
This, completely apart from the sight wobble, flinch, and grip errors of a handgun versus a rifle. To judge comparative accuracies of firearms or their barrels, one needs a steady rest and no sighting at all. Just clamp the thing down and see how it groups over N shots. Which is why Ransom Rests are on the market.
And for them revolvolator thingies, one should use the same chamber for each shot.
Terry, 230RN
REFs:
http://ransomrest.com/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benchrest_rifle