Author Topic: The tolerance of Google  (Read 4724 times)

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,261
Re: The tolerance of Google
« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2018, 12:09:46 PM »
No worries, they won't. Double frappaccino soy lattes aren't served at construction sites.

So buy your own food truck. There may be an untapped market out there.

Starbucks on wheels.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
Re: The tolerance of Google
« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2018, 12:13:28 PM »
I'm pretty sure Tacos and Gyros would be better sellers.
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama

p12

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 988
  • I SEE NOISES!!
Re: The tolerance of Google
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2018, 04:42:30 PM »
Until I get a Mac computer I’ll be stuck with google. Rely too much on the shared bookmarks and passwords.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 61,399
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: The tolerance of Google
« Reply #28 on: June 16, 2018, 08:58:14 AM »
Funny that we're talking Orwell, because that word "safety" is straight out of Newspeak.

They are never talking about actual physical protection from harm. What they mean is "safe from being made to feel bad for my own poor choices."

"Safety", right.

I was just reading chapter 3 of Peter Gay's The Enlightenment (Vol. I). He says that the philosophes claimed "their thought was a form of action," because they wanted to see themselves as practical thinkers, rather than abstract, bookish scholastics. In a footnote, Gay says:

Quote
In their self-protective utterances, the philosophes, of course, claimed precisely the opposite: that their thought was harmless because it did not lead to action. But as...Montesquieu's Esprit des lois makes plain, this separation of thought and action was...also a cogent argument in behalf of civil liberties, especially of free speech.

"Doggies are angel babies!" -- my wife

230RN

  • saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,880
  • ...shall not be allowed.
Re: The tolerance of Google
« Reply #29 on: June 16, 2018, 10:56:11 AM »
Yep.  Control the definitions and you control the debate.  Socialist Community Organization 101.
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.