Another tangent, but relevant:
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2018/10/10/imagine-court-reverses-students-suspension-for-sexual-misconduct-cites-total-absence-of-due-process/This happened at my Alma Mater. When the"hearing" was going on, I recall the local rag almost gleefully reporting on the accused being shot down over and over again regarding his attempts to defend himself. He was a male, so he must be a liar.
An appellate court unanimously reversed his punishment (though I don't know how much it well help him now that the damage has been done). Their decision is a long read, but worth it, just to see how this Title IX stuff destroys due process.
http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/B283229.PDFA couple of interesting parts:
Accuser claims she was raped while her best friend and another witness (both who saw none of what she claims) were literally sitting three feet away.
The medication the accuser was on (which she mixed with alcohol). The "hearing" committee allowed testimony from a cop who had zero medical experience, but wouldn't allow the accused or his mother to submit information from the drug maker on the affects of the drug because they weren't experts. At the same time, they had jacked around hearing dates to make it impossible for the accused to bring in a medical expert.
That's just a couple of highlights. As I said, it's an interesting read into these university Title IX tribunals.