Hmmm ...
There are two immediate ways in which right-wing judges and justices might help tilt the playing field in the GOP’s direction. The first is the prospect that Trump judges will move to protect the man who appointed them from criminal prosecution. That worry has only worsened with Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation—in a 2009 law review article, Kavanaugh advocated for a “temporary deferral of civil suits and criminal prosecutions and investigations” for sitting presidents. To be clear, there is nothing in the Constitution that prohibits criminal prosecution of a sitting president guarantees women a right to have abortions. But the absence of an explicit constitutional bar right may not stop partisan judges from discovering one.
Sauce ==> goose ==> gander
As for the anti-voting restrictions ... I'm old, and I'm white, so I guess the fact that I think I
should have to prove who I am before I'm allowed to cast a vote only shows how out-of-touch I am with "the times." Strangely, though, although I have to show identification each and every time I vote, in a national, state, or local election, I don't feel that I am being persecuted or discriminated against. I feel, in fact, like I'm being protected. As I have commented previously, I would be very upset if I showed up at the voting place late in the day and I was turned away because they said that "I" had already voted, earlier in the day.