No bah humbug. Nothing I said precludes anything you said. Just "progress toward."
My sore point (seems to be yours, too) is to guarantee bona fide qualified voters.
"Qualified" is subject to interpretation. Used to be you had to read and speak English, but of course, that limitation limited "democracy.'
So boo, hiss on that "qualification."
If someone wants to go that far again, it's OK with me, but I see the danger there as well, in terms of using subjective or "prejudicial" standards, etc.
But of course, once the bell has rung and the horses are out of the gate, all bets are off. Nobody who might be disenfranchised would vote for that, therefore we've already gone past that "tipping point."
Hence that approach is moot.