She was using both her agency phone and her personal phone to record the records. It was her personal phone that had the app that straightened and clarified the document images. That was according to the explanation she gave the wife of the store owner.
That's actionable in court. Like seriously actionable. That's using a personal device to record government documents, a definite no-no. Plus, anything she put on her personal phone gets archived to her provider/phone's cloud service, a service I highly doubt meets the security criteria for federal documents.
At the very least it should be felony theft of government data, plus something for intentional disclosure of confidential information. If she emailed or texted the photos to from her personal phone to her agency phone, that's another serious layer of criminal fail.
Brad
