Apology: I didn't read OP's link deeply enough to notice that it also referenced operation "Deep Impact." Careless of me. Let that be my worst mistake of the month.
.....................
If you recall, we did hit a comet with project "Deep Impact" on Independence Day 2005:
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepimpact/main/index.htmlWe even got a picture of it:
^*
We also landed on an asteroid IIRC but it was in a crevasse and its signals were blocked by the crevasse walls or it fell over or something.
I guess "landed" is the wrong word... maybe "asteroided" would be better.
So, despite the wisecracks, it would seem not only do-able but done-able.
Of course, there were mid-course corrections, but I like to think of it as 0.000000000001 MOA shootin'. Or something like that without doing the actual calculations.
Terry, 230RN
* Another example of velocity = temperature. (I wonder if any of the folks working on fusion reactors have thought of that --protons are +, electrons are - and opposites attract. I am seeing a bunch of hydrogen ions (protons) stuck on a highly negatively charged substrate with other protons (hydrogen ions) being attracted to it at high enough velocity to cause them to fuse. Just a thought I developed a while ago.)
The impactor was mainly copper with certain specific alloying elements so we could make accurate spectrographic measurements.