It's already been noted, but worth mentioning again. Springer air rifles will knock loose the reticle on most (yes, most) scopes. Big RWS rifles are notoriously hard shooters. My personal experience had lower end Hawke glass on a .22 Diana 34 wrecked in less than one tin of pellets.
The scope was airgun rated, and I was baffled by the sudden loss of precision. The rattling scope was boxed up and hawke sent me a new one, within a week, mid 2020.
One of the causes, I learned, is adjusting the reticle to its limits to account for close range POI. The springs that support the crosshairs in the tube are over tensioned. And the forward recoil on a big springer smacks em loose. There are scopes (I believe Ben's choice is one) and even more mount options that are designed for close range, and are airgun rated.
There is a whole 'nother world of airgun tuning which includes spring tuning, tube smoothing, exotic lubrication and aftermarket seals. I indulged, and my 34 is much smoother and consistent, and wears a Williams Peep sight.
The Hawke is on a Benjamin Marauder PCP. Even now it's POI is 50yds and most shooting is done at less than 20yds with a holdover. The RWS gathers dust.
The PCP is just plain boring to shoot. It stacks pellets end to end. The 34 and my other springer, a smooth shooting little .177 wierauch, are true for 8 or 9 shots out of 10. The velocity of the 1 or 2 odd shots might be up to 20% either side of the s.d. and it shows at the target. They're fun to shoot, trying to account for a springer's inherent inconsistencies, but for varmint control I demand the PCPs predictably, because even at 875 fps the .22 pellet weighs less than 20 grains, and a 1 shot in the tracks kill requires 3/16" accuracy.
My aunt had an old Benjamin 314 pump. That was a great gun, but they've been out of production for some time. The pneumatic pump design offers the same predictably as a PCP, but follow up shots are slow.
edited for added content and grammar
