Thread Drift:
I actually find it easier now than in the Pre internet/information overload age. I can read something (like the post above), click the links in the "note" read them, scan the profile of the OP for obvious bias, and find and and skim background articles in like 5-10 min. That generally gives you a decent feel for "true, untrue, or can't easily tell, don't trust" which is all you really need for 95% of internet news articles.
In the case of the linked post about the Bugatti, it took less time to get to the conclusion that that was *probably* untrue and move on than I have spent since talking about it. In the 90's it was much more difficult, or imposable, to look up competing news sources or even a different POV.
In the age of engagement farming for money and open propaganda fights from multiple sources you gotta be active about intel assessment.