I stopped at 7:30 or so.
I'll haver to respectfully disagree with the "10 yards and in Red Dots have no advantage" line. I shoot regularly with a pretty diverse bunch of guys, on a timer, and on a timer scoring accuracy (hit a 3x5 card fastest, Dot Torture for time, FAST Drills for time, Hostage swinger hits for time, etc) ALL of us are faster AND more accurate with a red dot. This includes folks that started on Irons and transitioned, guys that have done it for real and guys that just gun game a lot. It's possible Mr. Hackathorn is that .001% of people that isn't faster with a dot (for a set amount of training time), but everyone I meet in real life is faster and more accurate with a dot inside a couple hundred rounds of learning. Even Cowboy Action Shooters end up more accurate by far, and a little quicker with a dot.
It's also worth noting that folks that use a pistol on a two way range are pretty universally agreed that Red Dots are faster and better.
Ken's a better shooter than me, so if he says that's the case for him, I believe it, but I think he's steering his viewers wrong, because it's unlikely to be the case for them.
ETA: I find these types of lines similar to the folks that want to talk about the "Pros and Cons" of NODS. Yes, NODS have some things that aren't perfect, and they take training to use proficiently, but you're retarded if you want to fight in the dark without them if given a choice.