Author Topic: Trump Conviction, and...  (Read 429 times)

Bogie

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,286
  • Hunkered in South St. Louis, right by Route 66
    • Third Rate Pundit
Trump Conviction, and...
« on: January 29, 2025, 08:12:28 PM »
I figure the hive mind will know...
 
Was anyone else EVER convicted of the same bullshit they played up in New York? And what perzackly was it?
Blog under construction

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 35,479
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2025, 09:02:06 AM »
I thought he was accused of over-valuing his property that was the collateral for a loan.  The loaning bank agreed with the value at the time and the loan was paid back in full. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 49,538
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2025, 09:27:12 AM »
I don't think anyone else was ever accused or convicted, because the crimes didn't exist until they created (or perhaps "redefined" is the right word) them for Trump.
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 35,479
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2025, 09:33:50 AM »
Thinking about it some more, I think the charge was based on fraud statues claiming the valuation was fraudulent.  Any evidence to the contrary was ignored or not allowed.  I think the bank accepted the valuation and there were 3rd party valuations that were in agreement.  I never looked into it very far.
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Brad Johnson

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,732
  • Witty, charming, handsome, and completely insane.
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2025, 10:08:57 AM »
Thinking about it some more, I think the charge was based on fraud statues claiming the valuation was fraudulent. 

Real statues just sit there doing nothing.

Brad
It's all about the pancakes, people.
"And he thought cops wouldn't chase... a STOLEN DONUT TRUCK???? That would be like Willie Nelson ignoring a pickup full of weed."
-HankB

RocketMan

  • Mad Rocket Scientist
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,312
  • Semper Fidelis
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2025, 10:52:59 AM »
Real statues just sit there doing nothing.

Brad

They have to sit there doing nothing as their main reason for being is pigeon poop targets.
If there really was intelligent life on other planets, we'd be sending them foreign aid.

Conservatives see George Orwell's "1984" as a cautionary tale.  Progressives view it as a "how to" manual.

My wife often says to me, "You are evil and must be destroyed." She may be right.

Liberals believe one should never let reason, logic and facts get in the way of a good emotional argument.

Northwoods

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,982
  • Formerly sumpnz
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2025, 11:03:02 AM »
The 34 felonies was based on his payment to Stormy Daniel's being considered a campaign finance violation. They found 34 entries (mostly duplicated entries for like 2 or maybe 3 actual payments) to come up with that many charges.  They were all misdemeanors (if even crimes at all).  Statute of limitations had passed for charging as misdemeanors.  So they made them a felony by saying they were tied to an underlying crime.  However, that underlying crime was never defined, let alone charged.  I'm betting, if SCOTUS got the case it would be at least 7-2 in Trump's favor. Brown-Jackson and Sotomayor would vote to uphold the convictions just out of TDS, or not wanting incur the wrath of of the TDS crowd.
Formerly sumpnz

Brad Johnson

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,732
  • Witty, charming, handsome, and completely insane.
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2025, 11:17:16 AM »
The 34 felonies was based on his payment to Stormy Daniel's being considered a campaign finance violation. They found 34 entries (mostly duplicated entries for like 2 or maybe 3 actual payments) to come up with that many charges.  They were all misdemeanors (if even crimes at all).  Statute of limitations had passed for charging as misdemeanors.  So they made them a felony by saying they were tied to an underlying crime.  However, that underlying crime was never defined, let alone charged.  I'm betting, if SCOTUS got the case it would be at least 7-2 in Trump's favor. Brown-Jackson and Sotomayor would vote to uphold the convictions just out of TDS, or not wanting incur the wrath of of the TDS crowd.

I highly doubt it will get that far. The conviction is likely to fail (and spectacularly so) on first appeal for the reasons you mention.

Brad
It's all about the pancakes, people.
"And he thought cops wouldn't chase... a STOLEN DONUT TRUCK???? That would be like Willie Nelson ignoring a pickup full of weed."
-HankB

Bogie

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 11,286
  • Hunkered in South St. Louis, right by Route 66
    • Third Rate Pundit
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2025, 02:34:27 PM »
Thanks - stealing to post the 34 stuff at someone who claims that there have been 9800 folks convicted of "business document fraud..."
Blog under construction

JN01

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 998
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #9 on: January 30, 2025, 02:58:23 PM »
The 34 felonies was based on his payment to Stormy Daniel's being considered a campaign finance violation. They found 34 entries (mostly duplicated entries for like 2 or maybe 3 actual payments) to come up with that many charges.  They were all misdemeanors (if even crimes at all).  Statute of limitations had passed for charging as misdemeanors.  So they made them a felony by saying they were tied to an underlying crime.  However, that underlying crime was never defined, let alone charged.  I'm betting, if SCOTUS got the case it would be at least 7-2 in Trump's favor. Brown-Jackson and Sotomayor would vote to uphold the convictions just out of TDS, or not wanting incur the wrath of of the TDS crowd.

The Biden DOJ looked at it earlier and found no violations. The judge also instructed the jury that they could decide if there was an underlying campaign violation and that none of them had to agree what that violation was, even though no proof was presented at trial. 

Perd Hapley

  • Superstar of the Internet
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 62,729
  • My prepositions are on/in
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #10 on: January 30, 2025, 10:26:35 PM »
The alleged real estate fraud was a civil case, unrelated to the hush money criminal case.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2025, 09:43:47 AM by Perd Hapley »
Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?
--Thomas Jefferson

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 35,479
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2025, 10:20:19 AM »
The real estate fraud was a civil case, unrelated to the hush money criminal case.
Thanks for the correction. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

JN01

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 998
Re: Trump Conviction, and...
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2025, 03:21:48 PM »
But the civil prosecution of Trump for real estate fraud  was criminal.