Sorry, but that was a BFD at the time and since most of the information was either sealed up or effed up by the cops and other relevant authorities, it's still a BFD when new items appear.
Even when new data or theories for the Jack the Ripper case comes up, you get that kind of editorial "splash," but that's part of the game, whether you like upper case headlining or not.
My interest in it is the fact that I lived in Boulder at the time and the "splash" was continuous, and justifiably so. You could not pick up a copy of the Boulder Daily Camera without getting hit by it.
This was exacerbated by the fact that most people did not even know of child fashion pageants (I didn't) and of those, a lot of people found them (as noted above) "creepy."
In fact the JonBenet Ramsey murder generated a lot of discussion about banning child pageants altogether as being abusive etc., but I guess that movement sort of evaporated.
In any case, I appreciate your comments on the general "screaming headline" techniques of click-baiting (and I agree), but that's also the name of the game.
After all, there's an old saying about journalism: "if it bleeds, it leads."
Terry, 230RN