Ban Those Wood Stoves

[cordex]

But, do they want us to win?  Or choose electric because it’s cheap?

Of course not. Hence why they aren’t making electricity cheap.

[sumpnz]

Everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that modern nukes are the answer. Even most mainstream dem politicians in DC know it, but they won't rock the boat for fear of the squad and their ilk and the far left whackos.

Even then, the big fight would be streamlining the permitting process to create a reasonable timeframe to startup, and the EPA is basically an enemy combatant who would be fighting that from the inside, nevermind all the NGO lawsuits.

Only way we get a bunch of new nuke power plants is if somehow DC can eliminate the ability for enviros to cripple them in litigation over permitting.

[tokugawa]

Only way we get a bunch of new nuke power plants is if somehow DC can eliminate the ability for enviros to cripple them in litigation over permitting.

DC pays the groups that are doing the suing. it's how they get around the legislative obstacles.

[K Frame]

I have absolutely no doubt that they'll be coming for my pellet stove sooner rather than later.

[bedlamite]

I have absolutely no doubt that they'll be coming for my pellet stove sooner rather than later.

They won't have to come for your stove. They will regulate pellets out of existence.

[sumpnz]

They won't have to come for your stove. They will regulate pellets out of existence.

That’s why I like real wood stoves.  Can’t regulate trees out of existence.

[HankB]

That’s why I like real wood stoves.  Can’t regulate trees out of existence.

They can outlaw possessing firewood. They can outlaw gathering firewood. They can outlaw cutting firewood on your own land, citing Wickard vs. Filburn.

[K Frame]

They won't have to come for your stove. They will regulate pellets out of existence.

Either or, doesn't matter. The effect is the same.