The concentration on the step that may have been missing from the "close" procedure does not explain the multiple aircraft over multiple airlines that have discovered these bolts loose in inspections since this accident.
They knew enough to install the bolts, but not the cutter pins?
There's also the fact that when you pull the door closed and down, there's big ass holes in the hinge and the roller track, at eye level.
And the fact that the damn thing is spring loaded. How many spring loaded items are there on an aircraft that don't have a latch, bolt, toggle or something to secure them? Zero.
I'm not making excuses for Boeing. The incident was a cluster__, and the subsequent discovery of other aircraft with bolts loose isn't encouraging. BUT ... from what I've seen watching videos and reading articles by aircraft industry experts, the bolts found loose in other aircraft weren't those four retaining bolts, they were other bolts in or near the door/plug opening.
The question I haven't seen answered is whether the four retaining bolts on the incident aircraft were installed by Spirit and subsequently removed at Boeing when the door/plug was removed (sorry -- "opened") to repair something unrelated, or if they were missed when Spirit built the fuselage. As to the other aircraft -- the loose bolts I've seen pointed out weren't related to holding the door/plug in place so, if they were loose, they were probably loose when the fuselages came from Spirit, and the crews at Boeing would have had no reason or need to tinker with them.
If I understand it correctly, Spirit was originally part of Boeing and was spun off into a separate entity some years ago. It leaves me wondering how much or how little control Boeing has over their former division.